Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarks albatross: A Clinton endorsement?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:03 PM
Original message
Clarks albatross: A Clinton endorsement?
So, if the "big su-prize" that Clark is hinting at is a Clinton endorsement (silly us, Clinton said he won't endorse anyone before the primaries....?) or at the very least, a buddy buddy "this is mah boy" photo op, of what real value is it to Wesley Clark?

According to some, not much. To others, it could down right hurt him.

________________________________________________________________

CLINTON’S MUG SHOT WON’T HELP CLARK AT ALL
By J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Dec 31, 2003, 12:30

Was it several years ago that we read about Al Gore coming across for Howard Dean? My, how time does fly — quickly — when you’re having holiday.

<snip>

There are those who claim the Democrats just love Clinton. Well, not all do — that is, the thinking ones with morals don’t cling to his ankles. And for those, a Clinton / Clark clutch just won’t do anything worthy for the ballot box come November.

Furthermore, for those astute in historical data, the Clinton / Clark duo doesn’t ring true. Clinton, Democratic President. Clark, registered Republican until recently, that is, when he entered the Democratic presidential run in September.

Liz Sidoti, AP writer, quotes Stephanie Cutter, Kerry spokeswomen: "’He shouldn't be able to wipe away that record with one photo op of him (Clark) and Clinton.’"

<snip>

full article here -> http://michnews.com/artman/publish/article_2149.shtml

________________________________________________________________

Attention: My opinion on this article is that Mr. Swank underestimates the number of democrats who still very much like Bill Clinton. What he has right is that there are enough democrats who were turned off by the Clinton affair that this will not turn into the vote-getting event that either Clark or Clinton thinks it will.

Smile, Wesley Clark. You're on Downward Spiral Camera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nope - a repost of a locked on, now corrected.
Thank you for your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. So do you support this?
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
END OF YEAR FINDS WORLD SAFER BECAUSE OF GEORGE W. BUSH REALITY
MichNews.com-- Terrorism sneaked up on us. Global at that. Before 9-11, we went about our ways quite blithely. Now since 9-11, the planet has been confronted with an awesome, cut-throat dimension we had never counted on.
Dec 31, 2003, 19:20

http://michnews.com/artman/publish/article_2156.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Absolutely not.
Would you care to take a jaunt back to my thread post and read this part again? ->

"Attention: My opinion on this article is that Mr. Swank underestimates the number of democrats who still very much like Bill Clinton. What he has right is that there are enough democrats who were turned off by the Clinton affair that this will not turn into the vote-getting event that either Clark or Clinton thinks it will."

Hopefully that clears it up for you.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton: The best president in 50 years endorsing Clark?
Yeah that would suck.

:freak:

Next!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was an ignorant piece of tripe from a conservative source
Edited on Fri Jan-02-04 09:13 PM by Rowdyboy
the first time you posted it, and it still is. Pathetic. I'd love to call you what you are, but the rules don't allow it.

Here are some other articles by J (Jebus) Grant Swank Jr

http://michnews.com/artman/publish/cat_index_8.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. relying on a RW author
to minimize the effect of a Clinton endorsement??



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyJay Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, you posted this crap AGAIN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. Wha, whatever do you mean, BobbyJay?
I done fixed what got the sucker locked earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. wow
your opinion of an opinion by a RW shill.

And I at one time doudted your ability to sink lower.


retyred in fla
“Good-Night Paul, Wherever You Are”

So I read this book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Do you even know who J Grant Swank Jr. is?
How about this:

http://michnews.com/artman/publish/article_2160.shtml

THE PRESIDENT’S NEW YEAR’S HOPE MESSAGE
MichNews.com-- While Democratic candidates for the highest office in the land bicker, complain, pot-shot one another and basically waste energy instead of provide intelligent solutions to the nation’s challenges, United States President George W. Bush sets forth hope in his New Year’s address to the nation.
Jan 1, 2004, 01:25

Or this:

http://michnews.com/artman/publish/article_2156.shtml

J. Grant Swank, Jr.
END OF YEAR FINDS WORLD SAFER BECAUSE OF GEORGE W. BUSH REALITY
MichNews.com-- Terrorism sneaked up on us. Global at that. Before 9-11, we went about our ways quite blithely. Now since 9-11, the planet has been confronted with an awesome, cut-throat dimension we had never counted on.
Dec 31, 2003, 19:20

So what's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I mistrust anyone who habitually quotes/cites extreme
rightwingers. Shows where their heads are....If thats the best they can do, WES ROCKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. I was sorry to see that other thread locked
that RW site is so hilariously stupid, I was hoping more people would get a chance to see it.

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. again...
scouring the web to find anything negative about Clark and bringing it back here.

Too bad you can't seem to find anything positive about YOUR candidate to focus on. Nothing but slurs and attacks against Clark.

Makes your candidate look real good, dontcha know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boneygrey Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Clark will sell his soul
to get a Clinton endorsement. He needs it to look like he is a real Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I guess this one slipped under your radar....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. LOL...
yeah, that's it. A continuation of another flamewar based on Dean's past statements. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. you asked for a positive thread, you were given one.
And, you reacted in predictable fashion.

teeeheee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringEmOn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. So far to the right
That rag is so far to the right...reminds me of something a preacher said years ago, when the John Birch Society came slithering...or oozing into our community: "One(JBS and other right wing groups) is so far to the right and the other (communism, et al) is so far to the left that they probably meet behind your back."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Not Democrats liked Clinton...
He was only elected twice over a Republican Inquisition! You are right all Democrats liked him. How low can you actually go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. heheh...
all he cares about is scouring the web to find anti-Clark articles to bring back here.

The good news, though, is all of them are so lame, they make Clark look great. If the worst thing they can argue about Clark is that he voted Republican 15 years ago, and that the most popular Democrat in the country might endorse him, then we're in pretty good shape.

Clark, unlike some candidates, doesn't put his foot in his mouth every other day, so they're forced to dig up obscure stuff like this. It's a positive sign for Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. A Clinton endorsement
Seems to me people/pundits generally agreed that if Gore had had Clinton by his side...he'd have "won" the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyJay Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I agree
Whoever the nominee is should go on a friggin world tour with President Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Lets just say the endoresment of Dean By Gore is another...
one of Gore's bad judgement calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
22.  Runaway from Bill:My Strategy For Failure by Al Gore...purchase on Amazon
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyJay Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. LOL!
Btw, I don't think Clark would run away from President William Jefferson Clinton. Clark is featuring him in an ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. one more time...
There were several threads about the "big surpise" next week but the endorsement of anyone as the "big surprise" was ruled out because the campaign said that it had to do with an "idea". An idea can't be an endorsement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonoboy Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. as a non-American..Clinton is the US' most popular president..
the whole world loves him..his endorsement would be a positive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. Say whatever you like.
A Clinton endorsement would be a big plus for the General. Many of us still love, respect and admire the former president and have argued for his endorsement of General Clark. An early endorsement of Clark would help him immensely in the primaries and will be largely a no-op by election time. (What role Clinton might play in the general election can be decided later ---- I am wholeheartedly for a large one.)

Moreover, say whatever you like, Bill knew how to win elections, unlike say --- Al Gore.

Still I don't think that an (open) early endorsement is likely. Either way, sleep a little less well tonight, repuglicans, the General is coming.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
30. Gore didn't seem to want it
Look where that got him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
31. So many problems here.
One, you post an article that says Clark was a registered repuke. That's not true. I can't imagine why you think a Clinton endorsement is bad for anyone. Just ask Gore now if he wanted more help from Bill. He turned it down at the time.

And a downoword spiral? Does not compute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC