Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC should have disclosed Stephanopoulos was big operative in Clinton administration & campaign?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:11 AM
Original message
ABC should have disclosed Stephanopoulos was big operative in Clinton administration & campaign?
"Stephanopoulos was, along with David Wilhelm and James Carville, a leading member of the 1992 Clinton campaign. His role on the campaign is portrayed in the documentary film The War Room.<2> At the outset of Clinton's presidency, Stephanopoulos served as the de facto press secretary, briefing the press even though Dee Dee Myers was officially the White House Press Secretary. Later, he was moved to Senior Advisor on Policy and Strategy, when Dee Dee Myers began personally conducting the briefings and David Gergen was brought in as the new White House Communications Director."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Stephanopoulos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. "was"?!?!??!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well, they "claim" he quit...LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. It was very clear last night that he still is a Clinton operative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, it's a well kept secret that nobody knew until you let the cat
out of the bag!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. No one claimed it is secret, however the public proves often it has a short memory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Well, any of the really young voters who are paying attention to
politics for the first time may not remember him. They may not even have been ten years old when George Snuffaluffagus was in the Clinton administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I'm sure that it would make a profound difference to them in that case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. No. he should not have been there in that role.
There is no way he could be impartial.

No matter which way the inherent conflict of interest might have cut, it was a fundamental conflict of interest.

If ABC News had any sense of ethics left, they would not have put him in that role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I agree completely, but since he WAS, they should have disclosed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. In departing Stephanopoulos cut the Clintons loose not the other way around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Didn't he write a scathing tell-all book on the Clintons when he left? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Goes to his character, or lack of it. That still shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. They should have disclosed that Sniffyerass got questions from Insanity.
Sniffy is too stoopid to come up with his own questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. I really think that's secondary to this
They want ratings and buzz. They probably felt they could get the candidates attacking one another, which would keep viewers glued to the show. Instead, they simply produced a trainwreck that will do little for their reputation as journalists, but will give them bona fides with conservatives. I'm almost certain Hannity, Rush, et al will yap about the fine job they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. But they'll still wach fox news instead of them I bet....
I won't be a net positive for them in my view
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC