Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Senate Track Record?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:14 PM
Original message
What Senate Track Record?
Edited on Mon May-05-08 05:18 PM by question everything
This morning I half listened to "sound bytes" from a CNN interview with Obama.

And at some point Obama referred to his "Senate track record." Huh? As soon as he came to the Senate he decided that warming the back benches, learning the rules, marking his time - was not for him. And then Kennedy and Daschle, who have always hated the Clintons with a passion - after all, Bill Clinton succeeded where Ted failed - pushed him to run for President now, before he establishes any track record.

An oops edited. Wrote Kerry when it should have been Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama Is Our Nominee
Even if you believe this stuff, we need to work to beat McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not yet he isn't. These kind of statements are obnoxious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. It's obnoxious to say that he is our nominee
The probability is VERY VERY high that he is and the rest of the post is we need to attack McCain.

Assume that he is wrong, a miracle happens and HRC gets 80%plus of the vote in NC and IN and the rest of the states - what was lost? Nothing - what HRC would need is us fighting McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I have no problem with the fighting mccain. it is the premature annoitment of Obama
when there are states that haven't even voted yet that I object to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. that is exactly right. thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. It is very normal that the nominee is known before all the states vote
Edited on Mon May-05-08 06:13 PM by karynnj
In past years NJ voted in June - Kerry, Gore and Clinton were all the nominee before I voted in the primary. That said I would prefer the use of probable nominee until he gets sufficient pledged and superdelegates to win it.

All the same trashing him is not useful. As long as it is on issues - ok - but not personal issues. (It isn't unheard of Edwards was claiming that Kerry's healthcare plan was not affordable in the last week of his campaigning against Kerry in 2004 - Kerry polled ahead by as much as 20 points in the states that he won when effectively eliminating edwards Mathematically the next week - and Kerry still put him on the ticket. Had Edwards in desperation thrown in with the SBVT who had recently first appeared, you can bet that Kerry would not have picked him.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. If you learned anything from the past five months, you would know that this is not a normal
election.

In 2004, there were no major candidates left in the race and Kerry had clinched the necessary amount of delegates by this time.

Not the case this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. exactly, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. That's not my point and I believe Edwards THOUGHT he was a major candidate
Edited on Mon May-05-08 08:11 PM by karynnj
My point was that EVEN in 2004, where Kerry was very likely to get the nomination - one Edwards fanatic wrote an op-ed around then that it could still be Edwards - and Edwards attacked Kerry on his healthcare plan which was near universal, while Edwards was for kids only was too expense and Kerry couldn't pay for it. Kerry responded easily telling Edwards not to believe everything he read in the papers and then explained how the numbers worked - showing why Kerry, not Edwards had a seat on the prestigious Finance committee. Had Kerry not been able to easily bat it away, it could have hurt him in the general election.

Edwards had less chance then than HRC has now, but her chances aren't that much better. Edwards need something major to happen to utterly destroy Kerry in the then next week - and it didn't happen. It is far closer - and Kerry was far stronger than Edwards - where HRC and Obama are more closely matched.

It is NEVER the time for swiftboating - no matter what Wolfson says - it is also not the time for character attacks that will hurt in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Sorry Tou Feel That Way
But, realistically, he will face McCain in November, unless something amazing and/or nefarious happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Nope!!
Obama should not be president, he's not ready for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. So You Prefer McCain?
Because that's your choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. More bills with his name on it than Hillary
Obama-Lugar and Obama-Coburn to name two. I think Clinton may have passed something about video games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And post office name changes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hillary was too busy givinng had-jobs to the Bush agenda. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yeah, it's important that I be protected from adult material in videogames
You know what REALLY irritates me about that? The videogame that got her into a snit, Grand Theft Auto, had a modification (sold by a third party, not the publisher) that gave players access to a sexy bonus game. Oh, the horror. Someone might get sexually aroused - can't have that!

Talk about ready to pander on day one. And no, I don't own a copy of the videogame in question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. A woman said on Ed Schultz the other day
That Obama had barely unpacked his bags in Washington before he started running for President.

I do recall hearing that in the Illinois legislature, one of the house leaders pissed off a lot of long-timers by slapping Obama's name on almost all of the legislation to further his career. (I can probably dig up a link to this if necessary).

I find him to be extremely ambitious, and strangely impatient about it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. After seeing Bush win 2004, I don't blame him one bit for being in a hurry.
Too bad Clinton didn't have the guts to run back then. Or Gore, but at least he's taken himself out of the political game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Well Clinton had made a promise to fulfull her first Senate term.
So did Obama, for that matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Senator Clinton had promised to complete
the first 6 year term as Senator. As did, by the way, Senator Obama....so much for promises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Did he claim to initiate or create legislation when others did so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Emil Jones, JR.
All of the 26 bills that carry Obama's name were all from his last year in the legislature and most were bill proposals that were other people's work.

Also, research exactly how Obama got elected to the state senate in the first place.

As far as I'm concerned, this guy does not deserve the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. What about his floor speeches to defund the war?
Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Exactly!!!
The guy is a sham, was a sham at the state level and will continue to be a sham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. I heard that he got some post office named.
:P

I read that somewhere...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. So, where's the legislation Hillary has written?
I'm just wondering - seems if she is so big on the gas tax holiday she would have a proposed bill written by now, would have her plan memorialized and introduced into the senate.

Where is the stuff she has done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. If you use the standard the media used for Kerry - that it
only counted if his name was listed first - not much.

In fact though, the Senate is a collaborative body. Senators will introduce legislation and it will ususually be sent to the appropriate committee. A bill for a broad set of issues will be written and many Senators will push to get their legislation added to the bill. The bill though will almost always bear the name of the committee chair.

Additionally, a piece of legislation may be before its time and be ignored by all the powers in the Senate and then added to a bill when needed. (An example of that is that Kerry after he finished what could be done on BCCI - pushed for more investigation and published 20 items that needed to be done, wrote a book explaining how just as there was globalization in legitimate businesses, there was now global crime - of which non state terrorism and international drug running were two sub categories, and he wrote international money laundering prevention legislation - that the banking industry and the Senators influenced by it fought. It was added to the Patriot act and it is about the only thing that has had some success. Yet it does not have Kerry's name on it and he is not a co-sponsor of the Patriot Act.)

A measure of how good the two Senators are is how many endorsed each. (HRC has fewer but it is not a wipe out and I was impressed that Feingold at one time spoke well of both and criticized Edwards. I had expected him to be definitely Obama as they had done a lot of work together.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. I found a Senate track record!
Edited on Mon May-05-08 05:58 PM by FrenchieCat

The Congressional Ethics Enforcement Commission Act (S. 2259)

The bill creates an outside ethics commission to receive complaints from the public on alleged ethics violations by members of Congress, staff, and lobbyists. The commission would have the authority to investigate complaints and present public findings of fact about possible violations to the House and Senate Ethics Committee and Justice Department. By taking the initial fact finding out of the hands of members of Congress, who are often reluctant to investigate their colleagues, the bill ensures prompt and fair disposition of public complaints.

To avoid manipulation of the commission for political purposes, any person filing a complaint that they knew to be false would be subject to a fine and/or imprisonment. No complaints could be filed against a member of Congress for 30 days before a primary election and 60 days before a general election.

The bill has been widely endorsed by reform groups. According to Common Cause, "this legislation would do more to reform ethics and lobbying than any other piece of legislation introduced thus far because it goes to the heart of the problem: enforcement."

Public Citizen praised Senator Obama "for having the courage to challenge the business-as-usual environment on Capitol Hill and introduce far-reaching legislation." Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington stated: "This is the first bill that deals seriously with the lack of oversight and enforcement in the existing congressional ethics process. . . . This bill will help restore Americans' confidence in the integrity of Congress.

The Transparency and Integrity in Earmarks Act (S. 2261)


The bill sheds light on the almost 16,000 earmarks that were included in spending bills in 2005. Under the bill, all earmarks, including the name of the requestor and a justification for the earmark, would have to be disclosed 72 hours before they could be considered by the full Senate. Senators would be prohibited from advocating for an earmark if they have a financial interest in the project or earmark recipient. And, earmark recipients would have to disclose to an Office of Public Integrity the amount that they have spent on registered lobbyists and the names of those lobbyists.

The Curtailing Lobbyist Effectiveness through Advance Notification, Updates, and Posting Act (The CLEAN UP Act)
(S. 2179)


The bill aimed to improve public access to information about all legislation, including conference reports and appropriations legislation, in particular after hurried, end-of-session negotiations. Conference committee meetings and deliberations would have to be open to the public or televised, and conference reports would have to identify changes made to the bill from the House and Senate versions. Finally, no bill could be considered by the full Senate unless the measure has been made available to all Senators and the general public on the Internet for at least 72 hours.


Destroying Surplus and Unguarded Conventional Weapons


After visiting weapons stockpiles in Russia, Ukraine and Azerbaijan, Senators Lugar and Obama introduced S. 2566, which would expand the cooperative threat reduction concept to conventional weapons.


cosponsored Dru's Law (S. 792)


which created a nationwide sex offender database and requires greater monitoring of sex offenders upon their release from prison. The bill passed the Senate on July 28, 2005.

He also cosponsored the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. This bill increases the penalties for sex crimes against children under the age of 12, and creates a national Internet site known as the National Sex Offender Public Registry.
The bill will also provide grants to local law enforcement to assist in preventing and investigating sex crimes against minors.

Cosponsored the extension of Violence Against Women Act
(S. 1197)

which passed the Senate on October 4, 2005, and was signed into law. The Act provides increased funds to law enforcement to combat violence against women. It also establishes a sexual assault services program and provides grants for education programs to prevent domestic violence and encourage reporting of abuses.


The Senate Immigration Bill


Senator Obama played a key role in the crafting of the immigration reform bill that the Senate passed in May 2006. The bill, which President Bush supports, would provide more funds and technology for border security and prevent employers from skirting our laws by hiring illegal immigrants. The bill also would provide immigrants who are now contributing and responsible members of society an opportunity to remain in the country and earn citizenship. But not all illegal immigrants would be guaranteed the right to remain in the U.S. under this proposal; they would first have to pay a substantial fine and back taxes, learn English, satisfy a work requirement, and pass a criminal background check.

Senator Obama offered three amendments that were included in the Senate bill. The first amendment strengthens the requirement that a job be offered at a prevailing wage to American workers before it is offered to a guestworker. The second amendment makes it simple, but mandatory, for employers to verify that their employees are legally eligible to work in the United States. And the third amendment authorizes $3 million a year for the FBI to improve the speed and accuracy of the background checks required for immigrants seeking to become citizens.



Amendment to the Safe Drinking Water Act


which passed the EPW Committee on July 20, 2005. The Obama amendment provides $37.5 million over the next five years to protect the country's drinking water from a terrorist attack. It also instructs Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control to develop the tools needed by drinking water systems to detect and respond to the introduction of biological, chemical, and radiological contaminants by terrorists.


Greater Funding for Veterans Health Care


As early as February 2005, Senator Obama warned of a shortfall in the VA budget. Four months later, the VA reported that in fact it had more than a $1 billion shortfall. Senator Obama cosponsored a bill that led to a $1.5 billion increase in veterans' medical care. During the debate on the Fiscal Year 2007 budget, Senator Obama cosponsored measures that would have provided additional funding increases for veterans.

In September 2006, Senator Obama introduced the Lane Evans Veterans Health and Benefits Improvement Act (S. 3988) to improve the VA’s planning process to avoid budget shortfalls in the future. The bill requires the VA and the Department of Defense to work together and share data so that we know precisely how many troops will be returning home and entering the VA system.

Homeless Veterans


Every year, 400,000 veterans across the country, including an estimated 38,000 in Chicago, spend some time living on the streets. Senator Obama has been a leader in fighting homelessness among veterans. He authored the Sheltering All Veterans Everywhere Act (SAVE Act) (S. 1180) to strengthen and expand federal homeless veteran programs that serve over 100,000 homeless veterans annually. During the debate on the Fiscal Year 2007 budget, Senator Obama passed an amendment to increase funding for homeless veterans programs by $40 million. These funds would benefit programs that provide food, clothing, mental health and substance abuse counseling, and employment and housing assistance to homeless veterans.

In June 2006, Senator Obama introduced the Homes for Heroes Act (S. 3475), which would expand access to long-term affordable housing for homeless veterans by setting aside $225 million to purchase, build or rehabilitate homes and apartments for veterans. The legislation would also greatly expand existing veterans rental assistance programs and create a new office within the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to coordinate services to homeless veterans.

Food for Recovering Soldiers

Senator Obama introduced an amendment that became law providing food services to wounded veterans receiving physical therapy or rehabilitation services at military hospitals.
Previously, service members receiving physical therapy or rehabilitation services in a medical hospital for more than 90 days were required to pay for their meals.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and TBI
Senator Obama fought a VA proposal that would have required a reexamination of all PTSD cases in which full benefits were granted. He and Senator Durbin passed an amendment that has become law preventing the VA from conducting a review of cases, without first providing Congress with a complete report regarding the implementation of such review. In November 2005, the VA announced that it was abandoning its planned review.

Senator Obama passed an amendment to ensure that all service members returning from Iraq are properly screened for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). TBI is being called the signature injury of the Iraq war. The blast from improvised explosive devices can jar the brain, causing bruising or permanent damage. Concussions can have huge health effects including slowed thinking, headaches, memory loss, sleep disturbance, attention and concentration deficits, and irritability.

Easing the Transition to the VA Senator Obama passed an amendment that became law requiring the Department of Defense (DOD) to report to Congress on the delayed development of an electronic medical records system compatible with the VA's electronic medical records system. DOD's delay in developing such a system has created obstacles for service members transitioning into the VA health care system.

In September 2006, Senator Obama introduced the Lane Evans Veterans Health and Benefits Improvement Act (S. 3988) which would help veterans transition from the DOD health system to the VA system by extending the window in which new veterans can get mental health care from two years to five years. The Lane Evans bill also would improve transition services for members of the National Guard and Reserves.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/20/201332/807/36/458633

Global Poverty Act of 2007 (just passed out of committee)


WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senators Barack Obama (D-IL), Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Congressman Adam Smith (D-WA) today hailed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's passage of the Global Poverty Act (S.2433), which requires the President to develop and implement a comprehensive policy to cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015 through aid, trade, debt relief, and coordination with the international community, businesses and NGOs. This legislation was introduced in December. Smith and Congressman Spencer Bachus (R-AL) sponsored the House version of the bill (H.R. 1302), which passed the House last September.
http://obama.senate.gov /


Legislation would aim to cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senators Barack Obama (D-IL), Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Congressman Adam Smith (D-WA) today hailed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's passage of the Global Poverty Act (S.2433), which requires the President to develop and implement a comprehensive policy to cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015 through aid, trade, debt relief, and coordination with the international community, businesses and NGOs. This legislation was introduced in December. Smith and Congressman Spencer Bachus (R-AL) sponsored the House version of the bill (H.R. 1302), which passed the House last September.

"With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces," said Senator Obama. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world. Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing corporate profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere. I commend Chairman Biden and Ranking Member Lugar for supporting this bill and moving it forward quickly."

"Poverty, hunger, and disease will be among the most serious challenges confronting the world in the 21st century," Senator Hagel said. "This legislation provides the President of the United States the framework and resources to help implement a comprehensive policy to reduce global poverty. It is the human condition that has always driven the great events of history. This is a responsibility of all citizens of the world."
http://obama.senate.gov/press/080213-obama_hagel_can_1 / ---------------------

This compliments this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4678548


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. Thanks Frenchie. :)
I'm amused that Hillary's supporters don't think ethics is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. I didn't even know they had a track team. I'd pay good money to see Ted K. in running shorts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. you can keep that fantasy to your self ........pleeeese!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
27. he has good track record in illinois
he has been ok for a freshman senator....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
33. Here is a legislative result of Obama's work toward Open Government

Welcome to USASpending.gov - Where Americans Can See Where Their Money Goes

Have you ever wanted to find more information on government spending? Have you ever wondered where federal contracting dollars and grant awards go? Or perhaps you would just like to know, as a citizen, what the government is really doing with your money. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act) requires a single searchable website, accessible by the public for free that includes for each Federal award:

1. The name of the entity receiving the award;
2. The amount of the award;
3. Information on the award including transaction type, funding agency, etc;
4. The location of the entity receiving the award;
5. A unique identifier of the entity receiving the award.


http://www.usaspending.gov/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC