|
If there's one animal I don't understand it's the voter who "votes for the candidate, not the party". That voter ignores the fact that parties really do stand for certain principles. Sure, there are pro-choice Republicans and coat-hanger Democrats, but barring such clear departures from party platforms, a candidate who becomes an office-holder behaves in a pretty predictable way. That's why spin artists concoct oxymorons like "Compassionate Conservative" ;they're telling the voter to ignore what she knows about a candidate's party.
So, for people who want a progressive program of legislation, court decisions, and administration of government agencies it's clear that a Democratic president is preferable to a pachyderm. I'm not very happy with Senator Clinton right now, but I can't imagine what she could do that would convince me to vote for Senator McGOP, if the election choices boil down to the two of them. In other words, I consider the "second best" Democrat to be much preferred to even the "Best" Republican.
What I find most troubling about Mrs. Clinton is that she does not seem to support what I see as the fundamental truth of the present political system in this country. Instead, she has taken the position that Senator Obama is so poor a candidate that it doesn't make a whole lot of difference who Democrats vote for in November if she isn't heading up the Democratic ticket. While at times she states explicitly that both she and Obama are preferable to McCain, she says a lot of other things that implicitly urge people to think "if not Hillary, then what the hell's the difference who we vote for."
It's a winner-take-all, scorched-earth, burn the bridges behind us strategy. And it's a loser. A very dangerous, destructive, campaign aimed at convincing the more suggestible among us that only SHE can lead us to the promised land. The other Democrat, she says, is a pretender, a false messiah who will lead us into the Red Sea, and lacking her magical gifts get us all drowned.
There's a great old adage about "the PERFECT" being "the enemy of The GOOD". I believe that with the exception of Mike Gravel, who isn't actually a Democrat at all, every contender who started the current race under the Democratic umbrella would make a "good" choice for President, preferable to ANY of the strange fruit that sat in the Republican basket.
Putting a Democrat in office should have been a very easy business this time around. She has made it tougher. That's very bad. It puts her at the bottom of the pile of (still-viable and once-hopeful)Democratic candidates...still leagues ahead of ANY Republican, mind you...
|