|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:59 AM Original message |
Hillary feminists' hypocrisy: You're only allowed ONE woman candidate per election cycle! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
1. Just proof that it's not about feminism. It's about HILLARY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yup, she just uses the word sexism to get what she wants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Growler (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Hillary has truly muddied this term. There has been sexism but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. That is exactly what I was going to post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. It's about being a sore loser. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. they are idolators. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdpeters (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
41. That much has been obvious from the beginning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
2. I agree that females are not interchangable...that is why I wouldn't mind a female nominee just not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAbuchan08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
56. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ampad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
8. Great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
9. Nothing to add but K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
10. They're not feminists. They're Hillarists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
11. those responses are f***in' insane..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hokies4ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. Superb post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. That's my choice as well. Interestingly, no Hillary supporters are touching this thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
left is right (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
14. no not another woman as VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. This is a fine position, but is tangential to my OP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
16. Anyone who thinks naming a female VP other than Hillary will satisfy her fans is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Please, challenge my reasoning in the OP. Why would you prefer a man over a different woman if... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. They're going to hate his VP choice no matter who it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. So to clarify: You think it would be no difference if it was a man or woman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. No, to clarify: They're going to hate whoever it is. They'll hate a woman worse, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Not rational is right! This may be true, but it certainly isn't defended by feminist ideals... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. You're right. They are not feminist ideals. The opposite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
37. Begging Your Pardon, But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Interesting comment. Perhaps you could point to a post where someone indicated this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. I Mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Wow...OK...so, um, that's pretty strange.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. So ... Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Well again, that's a huge stretch. Generalizing all (or most) men from a few loons is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. And Another One, Today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. fans? this is not a fucking sporting event. it is about the health, healing, mending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Yes, FANS. Derived from "FANatics." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Deleted sub-thread |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I think the meaning of T.O.'s "fan" use was fairly clear...was not in sporting event usage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I used "fans," instead of "supporters" because the sentence was already long. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. your assumptions and interpretations are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
19. lol (nm) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
21. They're Hillaryists first, feminists second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. If they're feminists, they have some incongruent reasoning going on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
27. With all the talk of "sexism" in this race, Nancy Pelosi's silence on the "issue," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
29. There are two kinds of feminists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #29 |
45. I wish I could recommend this response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Agreed. It's one of those truly deep and interesting posts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. The engineer in me gets it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #29 |
54. So what happens when the inner circle collapses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
31. They're Hillaryists, not feminists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
35. Interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. In the follow-ups, there seems to be the belief that Obama would be seen as pandering... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
48. You're ignoring the fact that some Obama supporters here have suggested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. While it has certainly been suggested that both Sebelius and Napolitano... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
49. Btw, re your "only allowed ONE woman candidate per election cycle"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. If Obama decides that Hillary offers him the best chance I'm all for it...but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
51. It looks like they don't wanna touch this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Most of you have a very strange way to discuss women...particularly bright accomplished women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC