Re Philly Metro
http://parex.metro.st/ftp/20040824_1000006.pdf> Your article "Dole: Kerry Should Apologize" kind of turns the news
> topsy-turvy. The big news of the day on this front--if we're not going to
> discuss matters truly pertinent to the presidential election campaign such
> as the spiraling ever upward national debt that has true conservatives
> blanching, the deepening quagmire in Iraq, the continuing disappearance of
> good jobs for Americans, and the secret hacking away at our civil
liberties
> by the so-called Justice Department--is the Vietnam-era sailors who keep
> coming forward out of their self-effacing private lives to concur with
John
> Kerry and disagree with the swiftboat liars who went on the Nixon payroll
in
> 1971. Let us honor their moral courage.
> Must we discuss Robert Dole? If we must, I respected his long career
in
> the U.S. Senate but was disgusted by his retirement lunge for the big
bucks
> in his Viagra endorsement and his subsequent leering Pepsi commercials
> co-starring a semiclad teenager. If I were his wife, I'd move far
away--say,
> to North Carolina. Still, Mr. Dole was badly mangled in World War II, and
he
> is entitled to public attention on the topic of Purple Hearts, even when
he
> disparages Mr. Kerry's three Purple Hearts as not being severe enough to
> disable him for life or cause him decades of unrelenting pain. That is,
Mr.
> Dole deserves attention until he fails to mention what he wrote about in
his
> autobiography, his first Purple Heart, presented to him for his
> "self-inflicted" (in military jargon, meaning friendly fire rather than
due
> to enemy efforts) shard wound of his leg, a wound remarkably similar to a
> wound Mr. Kerry suffered that Mr. Dole now disparages as unworthy of a
> Purple Heart.
> You should have pointed out these disparities in your article, rather
> than just quoting bits from talk shows.