Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evan Bayh is no stealth Republican

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 04:33 AM
Original message
Evan Bayh is no stealth Republican
this certainly changed my opinion of him. Facts are a great thing. He's still not anywhere near my fave, but I won't be upset at all, now, if he's chosen.

http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/08/05/evan-bayh-is-not-a-stealth-conservative.aspx

The powers that be seem to have decreed this Evan Bayh Week on the veep speculation front, and Nate Silver has a nice post (from which the above chart is drawn) questioning the conventional wisdom that Bayh is a Republican in a Democrat's clothing. As he puts it, "there is no senator more liberal than Bayh in any state more conservative than Indiana." This is somebody from a deep red state who has voted against extending the Bush tax cuts; against confirming John Bolton, John Roberts, and Sam Alito; against the gay marriage amendment; against cloture on cutting the estate tax; in favor of comprehensive immigration reform; in favor of S-CHIP expansion; in favor of stem-cell research; in favor of restrictions on detainee treatment; and in favor of the Iraq troop-withdrawal funding bill. He even opposed CAFTA. It's true that he sided with Republicans on tort reform, partial-birth abortion, and a flag-burning amendment, but do Democrats really want to be the kind of party that makes litmus tests out of those issues?



<snip from 3 paragraph article>


MORE AT - www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. He didn't think Bush's illegal domestic spying was a big deal...
That says it all for me. He's a poster boy for Repuke Lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC