Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't underestimate the American people.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 11:17 PM
Original message
Don't underestimate the American people.
Edited on Sat Aug-16-08 11:18 PM by Drunken Irishman
I understand some here believe Americans eat up the sound bite answers, however, I do not believe this. I actually think Kerry's approach to the 2004 debates was the only reason he had a chance down the stretch. Now I know some will disagree, but compare polls before the debate to those after and you see a clear Kerry edge.

According to http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/10/04/opinion/polls/main647342.shtml">this CBS Poll done in late 2004, Kerry made significant gains after the first debate.

Prior to the debate, Bush led Kerry 51-42, or a 9-point advantage (teetering on blowout, folks). After the debate, they were both tied at 47%. What this tells me is that Kerry got back into the 2004 race because of his debate, a formula where he did answered questions thoughtfully and actually spoke intelligently, yet not condescendingly, like maybe it was perceived Gore was doing during the 2000 debates. This is how I see Obama, except with a little more emotion and comfort. Had Kerry failed at the debate, the election would have been a landslide for Bush, since he was leading by nearly ten points heading into the final stretch. Instead, it positioned Kerry to win and even though he didn't, I will bet you by late September, Obama is not trailing McCain by 9-points. Which means, if he gets the same type of bump Kerry did, he very well could put him away.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I disagree. The sound bytes are what reach the low info voters
Its not just Kerry, Obama, and Hillary. Its Democrats as a whole. You even see it on the talk shows. They try to speak to people like grownups. While Republicans are very good at sticking to a specific set of talking points. And they pound it away over and over. Unfortunately the majority of Americans are idiots. They hear one sound byte and repeat it over and over.

The Republicans have mastered this. Democrats haven't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Your whole argument flies in the face of facts.
If this were true, Kerry would not have closed the gap in 2004, instead, Bush would've blown the race wide open. Instead, the gap went from 9-points to a tie essentially over night because of the debate. For all the one-line sound bites we heard from Bush throughout the debates, it didn't help him at all. Kerry's real answers are the only reason he made it a race, or he would have lost by 10+ points nationally and probably about as bad in the electoral college.

Yes, sometimes one-liners CAN work, but they have to be really good. I've seen nothing from McCain that makes me believe he has a real good zinger stashed away for the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolverinez Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Agreed. Common sense.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Citing facts on DU? What could you be thinking?
If the facts don't jibe with most posters prejudices, they will ignore you anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't underestimate the American People
hell I am going to rec and kick for anybody with the guts to lead with a title like that on DU. lol

But I agree with you. People watching are not interested in who is clapping for who and they couldn't care less what Pat Buchanan says.


They also don't like people that are too religious and they don't like guys that fake it.


If they flipped through the channels from their football they saw Obama intelligent and engaged and McCain barking out his little get tough bullshit lines.

McCain didn't embarass himself but that won't get him votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Repig election fraud cost Kerry the election in 04, that and Repig swiftboat-style...
Edited on Sun Aug-17-08 12:01 AM by Triana
..dirty trickery. More than any debate performance - that's what lost it for us. And, they're planning it again too - only on a larger scale in 08. Repigs can't win on issues - they have to smear, lie, and cheat to "win". And - they will - and - that will cost more elections than debate performances or performances at cooked-up religious vetting trials like the one tonight - which was just another publicized political (religous) Obama lynching.

EDIT: And, on the American people? These mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging religious-freaked rednecks (along with the above tactics, which they swallowed whole because they're so stupid and gullible and unable to think) helped put GWB in office not only once, but TWICE.

There is NO WAY to underestimate that level of stupidity or ignorance (willful or otherwise). These people are not even above the level of your basic neanderthal. There's simply no way to underestimate the lack of intellect or ability to think or reason there (or maybe just the sheer unwillingness to do it)

The knuckle-dragging, cave-dwelling apes didn't evolve into humans. They're now called "Republicans". No evolution happened there. It's sad that they require a person of normal intelligence to "ugg" and grunt at them in short "sentences" (ie: soundbites) in order to be understandable to them and to appeal to their votes. Maybe Obama should try beating his chest and grunting in certain volumes and patterns. He might figure out what their "language" is. I notice McShit has no problem speaking it and certainly not George W - the current Alpha Male of the species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. The average IQ of any population as a whole is, by definition, 100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kerry did very well in both debates. Bush had to be prompted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Don't over estimate them either (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. The record speaks for itself
Reagan, Reagan, GHW Bush, Clinton (with Perot being the deciding factor), Clinton (ditto), Chimp, Chimp.

All the repukes need to do is keep it close enough to steal.

A clear plurality of the American electorate is too fucking stupid to use toilet paper without referring to the instructions. 20 years of Bushes and Reagan has lowered the populace's IQ about 40 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tresalisa Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't know how it is where other DUers live,
but here in the more red part of WA State, where I live, many people I talk to are so tired of election 2008, that seems like it's been going on since the turn of this century, and they're not paying attention anymore.

Course, that could be because they're GOP and are not entirely happy that McBush is their candidate! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC