Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The response I wish Obama had sent Rick Warren re his invitation:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 03:17 PM
Original message
The response I wish Obama had sent Rick Warren re his invitation:
Thank you for inviting me to attend the Saddleback Forum. I am always encouraged when Americans choose to gather, to listen, and to discuss issues that interest them. But given that this is a religious forum, I must respectfully decline. At the moment, I am a candidate for President of the United States. As such, I must focus on the struggles our nation faces on every front: international, national, local, and community issues that daily and directly affect our families, our work, and our country. I happen to be of the Christian faith, one of many in our nation, but I believe my faith to be personal. Americans are much more interested in my beliefs about choices and decisions that would be made from the White House, choices that reflect our need to take care of each other, to work for a decent life for both our national and our global community, to respect our place in the world, and to keep our planet sustained.

The separation of church and state is a foundation of our nation. With that in mind, I know you will respect my decision to decline your invitation. Thank you. B. Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately...
That part about Americans being more interested in decisions made from the White House instead of personal, religious beliefs is not entirely true.

But I hope that I will live long enough that when asked about their personal, religious views by reporters or self-appointed religious "leaders," both nominees will respond, "None of your damn business."

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent! Voted # 1 and rec't
You nailed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skepticscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you...
How bat-shit crazy was it to give a fundamentalist right-wing whacko like Rick Warren the power of approval over our presidential candidates? And not just this time...now that he's tasted that power, he's not likely to give it up, so you can expect this to be a regular and required event on the campaign trail in the future. And a "faith" forum? Please. As if you could even HAVE a forum on such a vapid and vacuous notion as faith. "Faith" is just a nauseating euphemism for "Forum on issues that are important to religious fundamentalists because god says so". What in the world qualifies Warren to preside over such an event, other than pure hubris? He doesn't represent all Christians, or even a majority of them, and he doesn't even speak for all fundamentalists.

People need to see this for what it is...an end run around the constitutional ban on religious tests for public office by the religious right. Since Warren is a private citizen and his church a private organization, they technically are not covered by that ban, but make no mistake...this is their way of ensuring that no one but a publicly confessed Christian can be elected president.

What's even sadder is that when Obama was invited to participate in a forum at which policy issues involving science and technology would be discussed, he did not even bother to respond...he just ignored it. To be fair, so did all the other candidates, but I would have hoped for better from Obama in a truly important policy area like science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't see how it is bad for him. He proved that he was christian & knew verses from the bible...
Edited on Sun Aug-17-08 04:44 PM by barack the house
To get elected it's earning people's trust. He did fantastic considering he was on his opponents turf. Obama for his own good and ease in running his presidency has to at least show he's willing to listen to all side. Like it or not religion plays a big part in the elections so wiser to address it than to shun it. Obama is finding the balance between the two sides of believer and non believer.

Obama got one think strikingly right in his book. Democrats will not be elected to the executive office unless they become more at peace with faith. Even as a atheist I can see that is a cold hard reality. If the Evangelical movement is worrying to people then is for some in the north to move to red states and teach the values of science and tolerance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Fundies are getting their nose even further into the tent. Presidential candidates
should not have to make appearances at the behest of ministers for purposes of discussing morals and religion. It is out of line. This will now be expected of every presidential contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Meeting with the President of Iran good
Meeting with a Pastor in Califronia bad.:silly:

Seriously folks how do you expect him to meet with world leaders who are hostile to our country for a variety of reason and talk about his positions when he can't go to a church in America and talk about his positions without everyone getting bent out of shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. That would have been a dumb move.
You know that, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Unfortunately, in our country today, yes. He couldn't have done it.
That's what is so frightening. The Christian evangelicals have far too much power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC