Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Romney: McCain Doesn’t Speak For McCain When He Suggests Renegotiating The Colorado River Compact»

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tannybogus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 10:58 AM
Original message
Romney: McCain Doesn’t Speak For McCain When He Suggests Renegotiating The Colorado River Compact»
Last week, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) walked into a bipartisan wave of condemnation in Colorado when he told the Pueblo Chieftain that the 1922 Colorado River compact, which governs the allocation of the river’s water among seven states, “needs to be renegotiated over time”:

“I don’t think there’s any doubt the major, major issue is water and can be as important as oil. So the compact that is in effect, obviously, needs to be renegotiated over time amongst the interested parties,” McCain said while on his way to the Aspen Institute. “I think that there’s a movement amongst the governors to try, if not, quote, renegotiate, certainly adjust to the new realities of high growth, of greater demands on a scarcer resource.”

Sen. Ken Salazar (D-CO) called the compact “sacrosanct,” adding that opening it up “would only happen over my dead body.” Senate candidate and former U.S. Rep. Bob Schaffer (R-CO) agreed, telling the Grand Junction Sentinel, “Over my cold, dead, political carcass.” The Denver Post editorialized that McCain “displayed a disturbing ignorance of the realities of the West’s scarce water resources.”

“Senator McCain has no interest in reopening the compact,” Romney said. “Senator McCain believes as I do that a compact that’s been worked out between the governors and between the states is the right way to go. States are the ones who build these kinds of understandings. The federal government shouldn’t meddle in that compact.

Salazar’s Press Secretary Matt Lee-Ashley responded to Romney’s comments: “Either Senator McCain is so out of touch with Western water issues that he needs the former Massachusetts governor to defend him, or he really has some interest in overhauling the law of the river that has been in place since 1922. Both scenarios are troubling.”

ProgressNowAction has a petition telling McCain to keep his hands off Colorado’s water.
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/20/mccain-romney-colorado-compact/

Yay!! Water Fight! McNuts stepped into it bigtime. Water rights is a more volatile political issue there than oil!
:popcorn:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chloroplast Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Did he really say that water CAN be as important as oil?
Where does this guy get his information? What good does oil do if people don't have water for drinking or crops? He's beyond out of touch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tannybogus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Let him drink some 10W40! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. What he meant was that...
water CAN someday become the type of multi billion dollar, public-screwing industry that the oil industry is today. Someday it can become another important avenue for Washington crooks like him to line their pockets. That is if we let him and his cronies renegotiate compacts and hopefully privatize everything in sight. Maybe someday water can be as "important" here as it is in places like Argentina!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC