Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain's short list is reportedly down to Joementum, Meg Whitman, Kay Bailey Hutchison

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:17 PM
Original message
McCain's short list is reportedly down to Joementum, Meg Whitman, Kay Bailey Hutchison
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/8/27/sources-romney-is-out.html?s_cid=rss:capital-commerce:sources-romney-is-out

DU, if he picks any one of those, we're guaranteed a President Obama.

Lieberman: A pro-choice Jewish Democrat? Republican doom.
Whitman: An unknown pro-choice billionaire? Republican doom.
Hutchison: Big Oil's favorite member of Congress in 2006 that doesn't want to overturn Roe v. Wade? Might not be quite Republican doom, but she would still be a HORRIBLE choice for McCain.

I'm so giddy after reading this I can't even tell you.

President Obama! Vice-President Biden! Make it even easier for us McCain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. so mitt romney has no chance? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. No Mitt the Shitt?
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I still put my $ on shitty mitty.
The old poot and the empty suit.

or

Flip and Flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamyourTVandIownyou Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. ya mean Mitt Romneedogonroof
Google "dog on roof"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22mitt+romney%22+%22dog+on+roof%22&aq=o&oq=

That'll go over great with middle America... or sorry, all of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerousRhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Dogshit Mitt
Hey, that rhymes, and it's true.

What a cruel asshole. That dog story still pisses me off. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sound good, but I have no doubt it'll be Romney
And I can't wait for Biden to let loose on him.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. I still say Pawlenty will be the guy.
He really doesn't have much to pick from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. I'm thinking Pawlenty, too.
McGrumpy needs a non-billionaire who's not older than God. Pawlenty and his 1980s mullet fit the bill quite nicely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
46. Yeah, we're in agreement on the reasons why. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it's down to those three.....
It'll be Lieberdouche. Whitman has zero government experience and I honestly don't think Hutchison would take it - she's already expressed that she isn't interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let's not parse words here. Hutchison is PRO-CHOICE n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. As is Holy Joe. Meaning it won;t be either of them.
No way he is picking anyone pro-choice.

I still say mitty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. All of the choices show us one thing:
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 11:24 PM by GloriaSmith
McCain simply is not comfortable pleasing the evangelical crowd.

When he loses next November, I'll be the first person to compliment him on this fact. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. If he can't secure his base,
he is dead in the water. The Indys are already going to Obama. McCain't sure isn't pulling Dems. His puke base support is fragile, at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. I would think the fundies would like an anti-choice candidate like Kay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. She is, but there are some things about KBH that will turn their base off
All of these I got from Wikipedia, so take them with a grain of salt, but Hutchison has stated she supports Roe, tried to eliminate the non-pro-choice part of the Republican platform, and sat on the board of some group that tries to elect pro-choice Republican women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #23
45. She's anti small details regarding choice because she has to be...
She's a republican in Texas. However, she has mentioned in the past that she does not agree with overturning Roe v Wade. To date, she has never had to vote against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #45
53. When has the Senate last voted on RoeVWade
Every activist judge nominated by George Bush that she has supported she votes against RoeVWade especially with her support of Roberts and Alito - the actually judges that CAN overturn RoeVWade.


She is anti-choice and there is no hiding that. And I call her anti-choice because this woman has also not once done anything to support the fetus after birth. At least with Bob Casey Jr, a pro-life dem, he will fight to the end to provide healthcare & education for our children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I don't know much about her
She seems to be more on the non-pro-choice side, but there is still plenty there to plant the seeds of doubt in the fundy GOP base if she's the pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. she is not on the non-pro-choice side she is ANTI-CHOICE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
44. That's because she's a republican politician who doesn't want to overturn Roe v Wade
We see this with just about all pro-choice republican politicians...willing to vote against the "details" while refusing to vote against or speak out against the ultimate issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. When did Hutichison become pro-choice?
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 11:24 PM by LynneSin
http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=53349&type=category&category=

I mean a NARAL rating of 0 pretty much puts you in the same group as Rick Santorum, Sam Brownback, John McCain and George W. Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
41. She is against overturning Roe v Wade
and while her record is indeed disgusting from our perspective, her reluctance to overturn Roe v Wade is equally disgusting for Evangelicals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #41
55. If she's against overturning RoeVWade why does she support Bush's judicial choices
The only way that KBH can have any impact in overturning RvW is by helping to appoint activist judges who are specifically designed to make abortion laws more difficult. If KBH really was opposed to overturning RoeVWade she would have actively fought to keep judges like Roberts and ESPECIALLY Alito off of the Supreme Court. Say what you will about Sandra Day O'Conner, who helped give Bush power, but she was firming in the pro-choice corner and is now replaced by a man who would love to see RoeVWade overturned (Roberts replaced her).

So as far as I'm concerned KBH's chit-chat about 'Oh we shouldn't overturn RvW' is all bullshit. It's easy to 'talk the talk' but her votes have her clearly doing the exact opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. The billionaire part on Whitman is somewhat disturbing.
But he'd have to spend so much time getting people to understand just who the fuck she is that it might get to the point of not being worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. How many houses does she forget she owns?
Actually, she sounds like a great choice, considering she has no political experience. We can look forward to plenty of gaffes on the campaign trail and the debate against Biden, well... expect her to fold like a cheap lawnchair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
59. I had to google her..
she's a millionaire corporate thug outsourcer. She is absolutely the antithesis to the middle or working class. She's also a big supporter of Mitt Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. PLEASE PICK JOE LIEBERMAN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. If McCain picks Lieberman, I'm vowing to go to church on Sun for the first time in years
That would finally prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that god exists and that she has a sense of humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. *snort*
No, seriously. I literally snorted. Like Krissy on "Three's Company."

Good one!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. I snorted tequila once. Well, twice.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 11:59 PM by The Village Idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. OUCH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
61. I'll one up you
If McCain pick Lieberman, I will go to confession for the first time in 30 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. All pro-choicers? Goodbye religious right vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Kay Hutchinson of Texas pro-choice. Tell me how a person with a 0 rating from NARAL
is pro-choice cause I'd like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. According to Wiki...
Hutchison is against outlawing abortion.<5> She also believes that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade was appropriate and secures a constitutional right, and that it should not be overturned.<6>



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kay_Bailey_Hutchison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #28
51. You're going to trust a website that can be edited by anyone over NARAL
um, ok

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Meg Whi...WHO?
Seriously? The freaking CEO of freaking EBAY? An unknown woman who has NO political experience? They're going to have to drop the shit about Obama being inexperienced then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. If McCain gets his way, it will be Jomentum
If his advisers overrule him, it will be either Pawlenty or Hutchinson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. KAY BAILEY HUTISON HAS A ZERO RATING FROM NARAL STOP CALLING HER PRO-CHOICE
http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=53349&type=category&category=

:grr:

I mean, I'm like the rest of you and want a pro-choice VP on the repuke ticket to help keep the fundies home but Hutchison isn't that woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. She did vote to expand embryonic stem cell lines for research.
If she's the pick we can rub that in fundie faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Well we're grasping at straws. I mean Lieberamn is 100% NARAL
I'm glad for her support on stem cell but that still makes her anti-choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Here's what WIKI has (yes, I know, it's wiki)

"Abortion positions

Hutchison is against outlawing abortion.<5> She also believes that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade was appropriate and secures a constitutional right, and that it should not be overturned.<6>

Hutchison is currently considered to be liberal on abortion issues, at least compared to most elected Republicans from Texas. Although she has served on the Advisory Board of The Wish List (Women in the Senate and House) Political Action Committee, which contributes to pro-choice female Republican candidates for Congress, she is no longer on the board <12> and the PAC did not endorse her in 2006. <13>. In the past years NARAL has given her ratings of 0%, 7%, 20%, and 0%, indicating that her voting record mostly favored enacting proposed abortion restrictions. <14>"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
52. Here's what NARAL has to say - which btw, CAN'T BE EDITED BY ANYONE BUT NARAL
http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=53349&type=category&category=
2007 In 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America gave Senator Hutchison a grade of 0.

2006 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 0 percent in 2006.

2006 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 7 percent in 2006.

2005-2006 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association 6 percent in 2005-2006.

2005-2006 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 75 percent in 2005-2006.

2005 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 0 percent in 2005.

2004 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 20 percent in 2004.

2003-2004 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 90 percent in 2003-2004.

2003 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 7 percent in 2003.

2001-2002 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 100 percent in 2001-2002.

2001 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 0 percent in 2001.

2001 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 0 percent in 2001.

2000 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 20 percent in 2000.

1999-2002 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association 0 percent in 1999-2002.

1999-2000 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 100 percent in 1999-2000.

1999 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 0 percent in 1999.

1999 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 100 percent in 1999.

1999 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 0 percent in 1999.

1998 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 0 percent in 1998.

1997-1998 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 100 percent in 1997-1998.

1997 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 0 percent in 1997.

1997 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 100 percent in 1997.

1996-2003 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 11 percent in 1996-2003.

1996 On the votes that the NARAL Pro-Choice America considered to be the most important in 1996 , Senator Hutchison voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time.

1996 On the votes that the National Right to Life Committee considered to be the most important in 1996, Senator Hutchison voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1995-2004 On the votes that the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association considered to be the most important in 1995-2004, Senator Hutchison voted their preferred position 8 percent of the time.

1995-1998 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 0 percent in 1995-1998.

1993-1996 Senator Hutchison supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 16 percent in 1993-1996.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. McCain is just feebly trying to make his pick exciting...
It's Pawlenty and it's boring as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. I heard he's considering Abraham Lincoln and Betsy Ross.
George Washington already turned him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curious one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
31. He is doomed. There is no good choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. you forgot to include the "Depends"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
38. I am concerned about the woman thing...
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 11:45 PM by MarjorieG
Although inexperience so near someone whose medical records have been hiden might be bad if we can bring it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #38
48. What "woman thing" are you concerned about exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
39. This is bullshit.
McCain is trying to create drama by floating lots of names. On MSNBC, Norah is saying that SHE was told it was between Tom Ridge and Pawlenty. Pat is saying that it is between Pawlenty and Romney.

It is still going to be Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #39
70. Two words, Robert Novak
the pukebag has crawled back like any horror creature to add his propoganda about the VP ... When was the last time he did that ??? When BO was on his oversees trip, and he was wrong as wrong ...

McCain's camp is throwing ALL KINDS of crape just trying to milk it for all its worth.

I agree, until I see that his ego has overriden Romney, that is where my money is at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
40. MSNBC's panal says it is down to Ridge & Pawlenty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. The guy who may have helped contribute to the bridge collapse versus Terrorist Color Codes guy.
Wonderful choices indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
47. Pawlenty would be a very weak choice and bring NOTHING to the table. My money is on Hutchison.
I can't stand the woman....but I think Mccain is looking to cash in on the squandered women vote that Obama let slip through his fingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
49. Kay Bailey Hutchison?!? DUCK!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
50. McCain's "short list" is guys under 5'7"
He's got a tall list, too, but only Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney are on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
54. McCain could make a really terrible pick
No matter who he picks, the response will be tepid. There aren't any VPs worth a damn over there, and whoever he picks, he is losing voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. It's like we had the first pick in kickball and got the superstar on our team
sure, the other folks have their good points but none of them will outside a pick like Joe Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #56
71. yes, Biden seems the obvious pick now
If Obama had picked a newcomer as VP, the cacophony from MSM would be unimaginable. They can wonk about picking a long time insider like Biden and how that's not change blab blab blab, but it's nothing compared to the outrage if he had picked a guy like Kaine.

Obama is very wise, and that wisdom shows in his choice of Biden. He is a thinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
57. Normally, I have no pity whatsoever for Republicans
But if THAT is McCain's short list, I'll send my condolences, and he can
save the country a fortune by conceding now.

However, THAT short list is so suicidal, I think it must have come from The Onion, originally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
58. 10 bucks on Hutchinson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
60. Do they anyone that brings anything to the table? I only have one concern
Edited on Thu Aug-28-08 09:19 AM by TornadoTN
The only one that I would say concerns me is Huckabee, since when he's out on the stump he can be a likable (yet batshit crazy) guy. I met him passively at the airport near my home when he came by for a campaign stop. He's a likable guy and he can relax a situation off the cuff like no one I've ever see. He spoke with me while I was waiting in line to clear DHS, never asked for my vote or anything of the sort - just spoke to me about where I was going, what I was doing, made a few jokes and shook my hand. Told him I was an Obama Democrat and he said "Will you vote for me anyway?" with a wide-eyed grin, shook my hand again and then was off.

The others, well, they don't bother me at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
62. Who the fuck is Whitman? Never even heard of her.
Don't count out Tom Ridge. I think he will be the one. As stupid as he is...

Then say hello to President Obama and Vice Predident BIDEN. :loveya: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #62
69. EBay CEO nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
63. No way he makes it that easy for us.
Edited on Thu Aug-28-08 09:33 AM by harun
Probably going to be Ridge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
64. Meg Whitman one step away from being President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
65. They ain't picking a WOMAN. What would that do to their "CIC-ready" blather?
Edited on Thu Aug-28-08 10:13 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TEXASYANKEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
66. Hutchison and McCain hate each other.
McCain desperately needs someone versed in economics. I, too, think the pick will be Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
67. Whitman? isn't she pro-choice, too? former governor of NJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. No, Meg Whitman - head of Ebay
Not Christie Todd Whitman, a moderate Republican and former gov. of NJ.

She'd be a smart choice, actually. So no chance he'd do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC