Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Funniest. MSNBC moment. EVER.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:31 PM
Original message
Funniest. MSNBC moment. EVER.
Seriously.

Ok, so I am watching MSNBC & Rachel & Gregory are talking about some new McCain ad congratulating Obama,
For the ENTIRE 2 minutes that I was watching, in the background, LOUDLY, you could hear someone
screaming in to a loudspeaker:

9/11 Was an inside job

over and over and over


HILARIOUS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. My bad, of course NOW I see someone else posted the same thing.
I apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know....
Joe Scarbrough's meltdown the other morning was pretty funny :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Damn me, I missed it! Is there video anywhere?
You are the 2nd person today to reference it and I am out of the loop....

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Of course! Here it is:
I watched it when it happened and I just sat there with my jaw dropped. Pretty funny hissyfit!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adyW_-lf27Q
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. HO LEE SHIT
I swear to god, he went nuts!!

Medication alteration needed, STAT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
47. OMG! Why don't we fucking melt there morning schmoe! What an asswipe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's an idiot.
I wish someone "gently" escort him away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not the Only One Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. Yep. He's a douchebag.
People don't have an inalienable right to be dicks. Someone there is totally within their right to kick the ass of a guy like this. I wish they would. I hoped Sharpton would have told the idiot to shut the hell up and show some respect for everyone else at that "event."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. MSNBC needs a microphone person that knows how to cancel background.
It's not hard but you have to know how to do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. it's actually quite simple...
The Today Show has been doing it for years and years with their on the street people. Silly MSNBC. Are they outside because they didn't get a spot inside?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. Maybe they don't want to cancel the background noise
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not funny. These people are an embarrassment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. I agree Nomaco.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can't wait until the Daily Show gets ahold of this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. They need Bill Clinton to wag his finger at them
and yell back "shame on you!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. ROFLMAO
He's screaming now. I'm LOLing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't find it hilarious at all...
actually, it is rather annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's only annoying if you actually care what these hacks have to say nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Ummm no...
it's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Rachel's not a hack.
Boy, you're just endearing yourself from the get-go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. They all are
All that occurs on these shows is dishonest and adversarial discourse over trivial issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. No, they all aren't.
I'll take Maddow as outspoken liberal Rhodes Scholar any day. Get a fucking clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Constrained and limited by the powers-that-be
Because if she says anything that people don't like - no matter how true - she's gone.

She's limited in what she can say and how much knowledge she can use.

Everyone on a "mainstream" news program is a hack while on that program.

It's theater masquerading as intellectual discourse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. That hasn't been the case to date.
Edited on Thu Aug-28-08 06:19 PM by Shakespeare
In fact, her vocifeous outspokenness has landed her her own show on the network.

Give me a specific example of how Rachel Maddow has been constrained from speaking her mind on MSNBC.

This should be interesting.

Edited to add: And Olbermann's "special comment" editorials he began two years ago had people just SURE he'd be fired for them. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Has either of them ever talked about the coup against Chavez? And the media silence about it after
it was found to be a lie?

The Dem Party has fallen in line on that one.

Have they mentioned it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Didn't it happen before either of them were on the air?
Seems on odd topic to pick up on, given the Bush scandals they constantly flog. But, whatever.

Sure, whatever. They're all hacks. I'll just go turn off my TV now. Bad, Robin! Bad, bad, Robin!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Lol...
"Rachel says a lot of good things, therefore she hasn't been restricted."

Good logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Except that's not what I said.
I asked you for an example--ANY example--of why you think she's been constrained. MSNBC has done what none of the other networks have done to date, and rewarded and promoted openly liberal hosts. Gosh, that's so hackish of them.

I'm pointing out specifically Maddow and Olbermann, and I stand by my position that they are NOT hacks. They're not perfect, but they're damn sure not hacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. They are hacks
They pander to their ideological viewerships just as O'Reilly and Hannity do to theirs.

I'm an Obamapendent, so I guess I have no tolerance for hackery on either the right or left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Oh, so you proclaim ideological purity. What a load of horseshit.
And, contrary to your holier-than-thouness, they're still not hacks. Iconoclastic and soundly liberal, but not hacks.

You sound more like a Ron Paul nutball than an Obama supporter, but you go on with your bad self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Hm...
Why are they any less hack-ish than O'Reilly?

Because their views support your own?

Intellectual apathy at its finest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. No, and that's an illogical leap you've made there.
They often say things that I don't paricuarly like or agree with; however, they're some of the only talking heads challenging the status quo right now, and investigating various Bush crimes.

My deepest, deepest apologies if that's something you find hackish.

I've given you much more detailed explanations for why I think they're NOT hacks than you have for any of your accusations. That vagueness on your part, my friend, is intellectual spinelessness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Is O'Reilly a hack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Show me where I said that.
Oh, that's right--I didn't. I do think he's a hyperbolic shitsack, though.

"Cut his mic! Cut his mic!"

Or, my favorite:

"What does that mean? Fuck it! We'll do it live! Fuck it!"

Real great guy, that O'Reilly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I didn't say you did...I'm asking you
Are O'Reilly and Hannity hacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Yeah, you pretty much did.
I started this subthread in response to you by saying specifically that Maddow (and to almost the same extent, Olbermann) are not hacks. Those are the only two I've defended, though you have continually attempted to twist my words into darling little strawmen. In response, I've continued to keep my point--and my opinion on this subthread--narrow and well-explained.

You've claimed ideological purity, and apparently are above it all.

I think it's quite clear where we both stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. You have been here - what - 24 hours?
And you sure are making your entrance with a bang.

BTW, cute screen name. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #32
49. I didn't say they were all hacks.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 09:07 AM by redqueen
Only making the point that there are some topics that seem to get little to no mention.

And while yes, the original coup may have happened before they were on the air to take a stand on it, there have been developments since then when it should have been mentioned.

Maybe they have mentioned it, I don't even know. I was wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. I turned the channel because that got as annoying as hell when done over and over again.
I have a feeling I'm not the only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Then that man has done our nation a great favor....
By encouraging people to switch off the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. It was funny about 5 hours ago.. A little obnoxious now..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Next Week Will Be Even Funnier...
Besides the various anti-war groups who will be in the Twin cities, the town will also be crawling with Paulbots. It's been amusing watching the crowds....and trying to read the signs. At the beginning of the week, there were GOOP plants with Gramps signs in the crowd, last night I didn't see any. Another favorite are the "the end is near" religious nuts.

Initially I thought MSNBC was stupid for putting their people in "the open"...but this has been the best part of their "coverage".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. Are they singing "we are gay?"
lmao
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's Alex Jones, eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. He is the biggest asshole I have ever seen on TV. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. MSNBCs entire convention coverage has been TERRIBLE....
They should just pack up and go home at this point. To top it off, they need to fire whoever it was who decided to have their booth OUTSIDE the arena and then stadium tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. who was screaming that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. Where's Bill Mahr when you need him? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
washingdem Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. Moment? He's been doing it all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC