Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good news: Kerry likely to win

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 12:18 PM
Original message
Good news: Kerry likely to win
Edited on Tue Aug-31-04 12:20 PM by goodhue
John Kerry likely to win US polls: Najamuddin

HYDERABAD: Former foreign secretary Najamuddin Shaikh has said John Kerry will win the US elections because there is deep anger among the Democrats and this will ensure that they turn out for the polls in larger numbers than has traditionally been the case.

http://www.hipakistan.com/en/detail.php?newsId=en71306&F_catID=&f_type=source

Now you know, so go help get out the vote.

http://www.democrats.org/volunteer/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. the goodhue
hey that's the name of the award on the Rockford Files(favorite show)they gave to Jim Rockford for being P.I.of the year...then they had a recount and gave it to Tom Selleck's charachter as Lance White
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. you don't say
Didn't know about the Rockford Files angle.
James Madison Goodhue was big shot in Minnesota in early 1800s.
There are a lot of things named for him around here.

http://rhet5662.class.umn.edu/heroes/goodhue.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renotyme Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. the former pakistani secretary of state should know!
a man with a very bright future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. no doubt
Najmuddin Shaikh certainly knows what he is talking about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is more damning.
No incumbent who served his full term in Gallup poll history has ever won re-election when he was not leading by atleast 9 points by September since Roosevelt in 1946 when he only lead by two. Thats 7 out of 8 full term incumbents who had a 9 point lead or more by this time who have won. The three who didnt have lost. Bush is now only tied. Remember back then they did not use likely voters only registered.

Caviat-Truman was down in 1948, but he took over after the death of Roosevelt. Gallup called that race for Dewey(Dewey lead in Sept was by 9). Well we know what happened there.

Caviat-Ford also was not a full term president.

INCUMBENT WINNERS-
1940-Roosevelt lead by 9.(Roosevelt won)
1944-Roosevelt lead by 2.)Roosevelt won)
1956-Eisenhower lead by 11. (Eisenhower won)
1964-Johnson lead by 30.(Johnson won)
1972-Nixon lead by 28 points.(Nixon won)
1984-Reagan lead by 21.(Reagan won)
1996-Clinton lead by 21.(Clinton won)

INCUMBENT LOSERS-
1980-Carter lead Reagan 44-40(Carter lost)
1976-Carter lead Ford 47-45 (Ford lost)(not a full term incumbent)
1992-Clinton lead Bush by 9 (bush lost)
2004-Bush and Kerry tied 47-48 (?????)

http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1252
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1255
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1249
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1252
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1246
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1237
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1234
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Roosevelt was dead in 1946.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. He made a typo
geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez! and the correct date shows up in his list following.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemOperative Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Speaking of historical precedent, no president elected in a year ending"0"
Has survived his term without being critically ill or shot. Many fatally. Bush is o fer. Maybe he IS God's favorite.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Reagan ended that run
they all died in office, Lincoln in his second term, Roosevelt his 4th. And I believe only beginning from 1840 on.

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/List%20of%20leaders%20who%20died%20in%20office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shhhh
don't give away the ending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty Pragmatist Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. LOL. ;-)
Regardless of the source, it's probably not far from the truth to say the madder side will win in November.

I'm pretty mad, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemOperative Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think the mad side is in charge now
Bush's top advisor:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC