Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

bush/limpballs.."we can win the war", "we can't win the war"."what I meant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 04:31 PM
Original message
bush/limpballs.."we can win the war", "we can't win the war"."what I meant
Edited on Tue Aug-31-04 04:48 PM by RedEarth
This is from Josh Marshall's site.....and an excert from bush's chat with rush this afternoon.


Here is bush explaining what he meant on winning the war on terror.

"We can't win the war on terror actually means we can win but our victory won't be memorialized in a peace treaty ....

I should have made my point more clear about what I meant. What I meant was that this is not a conventional war. It is a different kind of war. We're fighting people who have got a dark ideology who use terrorists, terrorism, as a tool. They're trying to shake our conscience. They're trying to shake our will, and so in the short run the strategy has got to be to find them where they lurk. I tell people all the time, "We will find them on the offense. We will bring them to justice on foreign lands so we don't have to face them here at home," and that's because you cannot negotiate with these people. And in a conventional war there would be a peace treaty or there would be a moment where somebody would sit on the side and say we quit. That's not the kind of war we're in, and that's what I was saying. The kind of war we're in requires, you know, steadfast resolve, and I will continue to be resolved to bring them to justice, but as well as to spread liberty ... There's no doubt in my mind, so long as this country stays resolved and strong and determined, and by winning, I just would remind your listeners that Pakistan is now an ally in the war on terror.
The president deserves every whack he gets for changing his position twice in three days on the issue he has made the centerpiece of his campaign. But folks should also start using his bobbling to make the point that the issue is less whether the president thinks the 'terror war' is winnable than the fact that he doesn't even have any clear idea of how to fight it."

(A reader makes a good point: Reading the above, you can see why President Bush doesn't 'do nuance.' It ain't his strong suit.)


http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2004_08_29.php#003384

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other than sucking a - , is anything his strong suit??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. is that a quote, or your own satire? very good, if it is, cause
Edited on Tue Aug-31-04 04:34 PM by buycitgo
I remember the questions arising over whether he said ''shape'' or ''shake our conscience,'' neither of which makes much sense

if it's a quote, got a link?

thx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soupkitchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is trying to shake our conscience a bad thing?
Is having a conscience now a bad thing?
Or is Bush saying if we had a foreign policy with a conscience there wouldn't be any terroriists to begin with.
It's a very strange imagery, one that Bush has used before. Conscience as a sign of weakness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC