Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm a Federalist - claims the Alaskan Oxymoron

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:03 PM
Original message
I'm a Federalist - claims the Alaskan Oxymoron
In an interview broadcast Wednesday on the "CBS Evening News," the Republican vice presidential candidate cast herself as a federalist in explaining why she thought the court got it wrong on the landmark decision that legalized abortion.

She also could not name any other decisions by the high court that she disagrees with.

"I think it should be a states issue not a federal government, mandated, mandating yes or no on such an important issue," said Palin, who opposes abortion except in cases where the pregnancy threatens the woman's life.

"I'm in that sense a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas," she added.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081002/ap_on_el_pr/palin_supreme_court


Sarah, honey... a Federalist is one who believes that Federal law trumps state law.

Sit down before your last two brain cells quit working.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think so
A Federalist, in this context, is a believer in "states' rights."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No. Federalists believe in a strong central government
Dates back, oh 200+ years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. in modern-day jargon...
a Federalist is a believer in states' rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. and war is peace, freedom is slavery
got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't that oxy-moran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Oh you betcha, yea! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. In the US a Federalist respects the separation of powers, and upholds the state as
as a protection against the encroachments of the federal governement. As wikipedia explains, someone in America today who calls themselves a Federalist is probably a new school federalist and supports the strengthening of state power, as a means to protect freedom.

"New Federalism, which is characterized by a gradual return of power to the states, was initiated by President Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) with his "devolution revolution" in the early 1980s and lasted until 2001. Previously, the federal government had granted money to the states categorically, limiting the states to use this funding for specific programs. Reagan's administration, however, introduced a practice of giving block grants, freeing state governments to spend the money at their own discretion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So new Federalism is the opposite of Federalism
like neo conservatism is the opposite of conservatism?

Got it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. So she believes any state can ban all gun ownership then!
Where is the outrage by the NRA now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. No it isn't
A federalist is someone who belongs to the Federalist Society....

About Us
Our Purpose
Law schools and the legal profession are currently strongly dominated by a form of orthodox liberal ideology which advocates a centralized and uniform society. While some members of the academic community have dissented from these views, by and large they are taught simultaneously with (and indeed as if they were) the law.
The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. The Society seeks both to promote an awareness of these principles and to further their application through its activities.
This entails reordering priorities within the legal system to place a premium on individual liberty, traditional values, and the rule of law. It also requires restoring the recognition of the importance of these norms among lawyers, judges, law students and professors. In working to achieve these goals, the Society has created a conservative and libertarian intellectual network that extends to all levels of the legal community.

http://www.fed-soc.org/aboutus/

The current asshats in Washington have appointed as many of these fuckwits as they can to important DOJ posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. perfect Rovian tactics
change the meaning of words, and nobody can agree on anything.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC