Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So if Drudge is right, Rasmussen tomorrow will have Obama: 50, McCain 45.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:17 PM
Original message
So if Drudge is right, Rasmussen tomorrow will have Obama: 50, McCain 45.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that means McCain didn't actually gain support, rather Obama lost a point.

That isn't too bad, especially if his number was rounded up and it was barely above .5%, thus meaning if it dipped, it probably dipped by statistical noise and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. That would still be consistent with Rasmussen's numbers. Obama has varied between 50 and 52%
While McCain has bounced along the bottom at 43-45. Those numbers have been extremely consistent for more than 2 weeks now. I don't see what the story is here.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Drudge is trying to create a McCain bounce.
You see it with his headline talking about a McCain comeback.

It's quite sad.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They are setting it up
to make it easier for the repukes to steal.It's as simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No they're not.
:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Have another drink
and stay in your fantasy land. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't need to stay in my fantasy land.
I love how everyone thinks Rove is this powerful. How he's going to get every goddamn polling company in America to cook its numbers so they can steal the election.

Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Where were you in 2000? And 2004?
Ever heard of them stealing both of those elections? I guess not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Where were you in 2000 and 2004?
The election was always close. No candidate had a consistent lead like Obama has in 2008.

Do you not remember that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11cents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Thank you.
In 2000 and 2004 the polls were close, and so were the results. We've got enough to fret about without driving ourselves crazy with I'm-more-paranoid-and-therefore-smarter-than-you frantic handwaving that doesn't take basic facts into consideration.

Drudge, FWIW, is simply trying to drive the MSM narrative, having had a record of success with all the tools who say he "rules their world." He's too dumb to know that in this case it's actually reality that's going to count, not media blither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Yes I remember
But the repukes are whipped up in a frenzy thinking their boy might get his ass kicked by a oh heaven forbid a BLACK man. I watch enough tv to see it written all over their faces. They better not try to steal THIS one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. They'll try, but they won't.
Because it won't be close enough to steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I'm hoping for a landslide
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. those elections swung on 1 state
This one swings on a dozen

They can't steal them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. That is a good point.
Kerry's strategy, as was Gore's in 2000, banked on Ohio/Florida, which were toss-ups regardless of whether or not Dems thought they could win them.

With all the talk about stealing, let's not forget had Gore won New Hampshire or his home state, he would have won that election, making Florida irrelevant.

He did not.

Kerry, likewise, could have won Iowa, Colorado @ New Mexico or Nevada and he'd be president right now.

For them to steal, they'd have to steal both Florida & Ohio, along with Virginia, North Carolina, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, maybe Indiana and Missouri.

Not. Going. To. Happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
32. Don't pay attention to the stolen election idiots
They're sad defeatists who only make sense to each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. I guess we should just give up then
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I am guessing they will leave out the ABC poll
It would prop up their narrative of a bounce for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Also he says Zogby will be 48-44%
That means McCain will have gained a point.

It's just statistical noise and Drudge is trying to push the notion that it's a McCain bounce.

What a tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. If Drudge considers it positive that Obama is at 50%, then I'm laughing at his ass
That's not erosion of his position.

:rofl:

Even if Mccain convinces 80% of undecideds (unheard of), he loses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. No only that - I doubt swing voters read Drudge
Edited on Sun Oct-12-08 11:26 PM by FreeState
I think if he's trying to manipulate anyone its GOP voters to donate to the RNC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Correct me if I'm wrong
with all 3rd party candidates and write ins that totals 1-2% therefore if the election was held tommorow and the poll is accurate Obama has won probably by a landslide even if McCain pulls in 80% of undecided voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. You're not wrong
That's exactly what it means.

Why Drudge would be pushing a poll that essentially shows Obama kicking the living crap out of the gopERS IS A GRAND MYSTERY, HOWEVER.

:ROFL:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Has Drudge ever been right about anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. All I want is that 50%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. But another says:
"Powered chiefly by the public's economic concerns, Obama leads John McCain by 10 points among likely voters, 53-43 percent, in this ABC News/Washington Post poll. Though every race is different, no presidential candidate has come back from an October deficit this large in pre-election polls dating to 1936."



http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Politics/story?id=6017487&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. Rass has an extremely stable race right now
From his report yesterday "This is the seventeenth straight day that Obama’s support has stayed in the very narrow range from 50% to 52% while McCain has been at 44% of 45%" If Drudge's numbers are right, that makes it 18 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. It was 50 45 2 days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I agree, by mid-week, Obama will be up 7 again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. Drudgereport.com is ALWAYS right.
That's the problem with it!


rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. weekend?
isn't this the normal couple of point downtock that happens on weekends?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
29. I wonder why Drudge doesn't have the new ABC poll included...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. He didn't quote the Gallup poll that had Obama up 11, either.
And he completely ignored Sunday's Zogby, which had Obama gaining a point.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
30. This "change" means nothing -- it has no statistical significance.
And polls are all about statistics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
31. Drudge has McCain saying "Ready for a Comeback" on his web site
What a republican DWEEB he is ... trying to create the appearance of McFailure coming up in the polls..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
35. Zogby - Drudge was right... 48 O 44 M - the poll is crap though
Edited on Mon Oct-13-08 01:36 AM by FreeState
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1584

In this latest report, McCain gained eight-tenths of a point, while Obama lost one full point.

While the worldwide economic system underwent dramatic turmoil last week, the poll shows the presidential race remarkably unchanged overall at the end of the first full week of daily tracking. Through the week, Obama has always held a small lead, as large as 6.1 points (on Saturday) and as little as 1.9 points (last Wednesday).

The rolling telephone tracking poll included a sample of 1,206 likely voters collected over the previous three 24-hour periods spanning four calendar days – approximately 400 per 24-hour period from Oct. 9-12, 2008.

Obama retains a substantial 17-point lead among independent voters, but that edge receded from 21 points yesterday. In terms of securing their political bases, both Obama and McCain are doing well. Among Democrats, Obama wins 86% support, while McCain wins 88% support among Republicans.

----

Bold added by me to show why its crap - there are more registered Dems than GOP by about 7% - then add the 17% of the 30% of independents. Also the ABC poll was almost 3 times as many people - more accurate - 400 people is to small a sample.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC