Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama ran as a Fusion Candidate WTF is that?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Heather MC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:51 AM
Original message
Obama ran as a Fusion Candidate WTF is that?
MSNBC has this nut bag supposed Democrat
Charna Lazar, saying she is voting for McCain, because Obama ran as a fusion candidate
and doesn't have the experience to be president, he not ready and we don't know enough abou his background. Who is this bitch and why did MSNBC get her all that time to spew FAUX noise bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't much like Jazz fusion either...
...but I'm guessing that's not what she's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fusion Party
Fusion Party is a term that may have a variety of meanings in the political history of the United States.

The Fusion Party was the original name of the Republican Party in the state of Ohio. In 1854, anti-slavery parties were forming in many northern states in opposition to the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854. While many of these state parties adopted the name "Republican", the Ohio convention adopted the name "Fusionist" or "Fusion Party", which they felt more accurately described the fusion of person from a variety of political backgrounds, including members of the Free Soil Party, the Conscience Whig Party, the Know-Nothing Party, as well as members of the Democratic Party who were opposed to slavery.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_Party

I don't think that word means what she thinks it means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. And then there is Electoral Fusion, which is what I thought she might be referring to
"Electoral fusion is an arrangement where two or more political parties support a common candidate, pooling the votes for all those parties. By offering to endorse a major party's candidate, minor parties can influence the candidate's platform."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fusion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. What party was he fused with and where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama ran on more than one party line...
...in the, IIRC, 1996, Illinois elections as both a Democrat and a New Party candidate.

Same thing happens with Conservative and Republican party fusion candidates in NY all the time -- but you don't hear Fox screeching about that, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. No, he didn't.
He was endorsed by the New Party, but did not run as an NP candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I was sure he ran on both lines....
...but the old New Party website is ambiguous. The first time I think ever saw Obama's name was in a New Party ad in Democratic Left , the DSA's newsletter-magazine.

But that could just have been a list of endorsees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I saw a pic clipped from a New Party newsletter with member and endorsee winners pictured.
Obama was in the picture with about four other folks. In the caption, a few of the people were listed as New Party members, but Obama and at least one other election winner was listed specifically as an endorsee.

I apologize, but I don't remember exactly where I saw it. I'm pretty sure it was here, so hopefully someone can share it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Still, to think we both knew the lad...
...back when.

Should be good for at least an Assistant-Undersecretary of Something gig, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm pretty sure she doesn't what she is talking about
so I don't think anyone else will either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. I didn't see her...is this her?
http://mensa.meetup.com/100/members/7428915/

Google says she might be a disgruntled Hillary supporter. Ex-CIA. Sounds like someone Madfloridian might have the skinny on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. She's a Palm Beach Mensa memeber?
Bwhahahahah :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Did you notice how much her face twitched?
It's always curious to me how much rage is seething just below the surface of these people.

Young, old, Republican, PUMA, racist or bigot; McCain's supporters all seem to have one thing in common...RAGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr1956 Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just more mud against the wall
I think it may be about a social democratic party, the New Party, that went defunct in the late 1990's. They had an association with ACORN and were considered progressive. This piece of so-called-news has been out there a while according to my Google search.

I didn't see where he was a member, but the allegation is that he sought their endorsement.

I swear these people run these rumors like a game of telephone! They get one little piece of information ie social democrat and blow it up into a whole story about Obama is a socialist. How pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. It means that the "New Party"...
Edited on Mon Oct-13-08 12:05 PM by regnaD kciN
...a small, now-defunct progressive party like the Greens, endorsed him and listed him (without his accepting their endorsement) on their "slate of candidates," even though he was running as a Democrat rather than a New Party member.

The New Party (of which I was a member) had a policy that it would only build itself from the ground up, running its own candidates for slots like city council and school board, while filling its "ticket" with the most progressive candidate running in the other races (generally the Democrat). The Party's goal was to make "fusion voting" legal, so that someone could vote a "straight party" ticket in the voting booth, and have those votes go to the Democrats they endorsed in the other races as well as to their own candidates in the down-ticket races. When the Supreme Court ruled against them on this, they basically closed up shop.

What it means, in this case, is practically nothing. Obama ran as a Democrat, and probably never even heard of the New Party. The Republicans are trying to turn this into an issue by (falsely) claiming, first of all, that the New Party was "socialist," and then jumping from there to imply that Obama wasn't a real Democrat, but a closet socialist trying to present himself as a Democrat. As usual from the Republicans, it's a lie from beginning to end. I'm particularly pissed-off at their "the New Party was socialist" line, because it's demonstrably false, but they're counting on the fact that the New Party isn't around anymore, so it won't have an official spokesperson to debunk the story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does he drive this, maybe?




:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is this their new thing? If you say I'm a democrat but I'm voting for
McCain you can be on TV? CNN and MSNBC are offering coverage for anybody who will come forward and make an ass of themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heather MC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Only if you are white, if you are black you can say I am a conservative and
I am begging you to go hard and people are whooping my ass

and then you can be on tv too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. IDK maybe they watch to much DBZ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC