|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:43 AM Original message |
I don't get it. What the hell is wrong with "We have a righteous wind at our back."? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
1. Oh, who knows anymore.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snotcicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
2. Nothing wrong with it. I like it and agree with it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatsDogsBabies (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I like it too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedSpartan (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
4. I think the implication is that "righteous" implies some kind of divine intervention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yeah, I think it can mean that. But I think it can also mean just... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southpaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
5. You've got to be kidding me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
7. Frankly, I wish both campaigns would leave God out of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Like the poster said above, "righteous" has a meaning outside of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Get a grip? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. I was referencing your complaint about inserting God into everything, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeschutesRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
8. Nothing. I say that, and I am not even religious (in any organized way) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
9. I heard it..loved it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Amen! It was righteous. The GOP don't have a lock on The Divine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:58 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Or with what is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. "Lock"? Republicans don't have a TOEHOLD on "what is right". They are EVIL, and I do not jest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Yes, you're right..it's a classic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErinBerin84 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
11. I don't even really associate that necessarily with religion,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
14. It could have sounded pretty weird, except Obama followed up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
15. Could be the hint of social justice in the phrase, just like the dreaded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
17. Here. Try this at another thread.....The "Righteous Brothers"....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
18. NOTHING. Republican morons will attack EVERYTHING NOW. They are DESPERATE, CORNERED. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Batgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
19. There is nothing wrong with it. In fact, I think it's a true statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morning Dew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
22. did you say righteous? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Claire Beth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
23. nothing wrong with it...the mcshame people are just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
25. Who said it was wrong? I like it! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. They're not really saying what's wrong with it. As in the responses above... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barack the house (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
27. Helping people is the right thing to do. All they are saying is STARVE! or words to that effect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC