Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you feel like polls mean nothing?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
holiday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:22 PM
Original message
Do you feel like polls mean nothing?
I'm just wondering. I go to another board and they believe that McCain could still pull it off because they think the polls mean nothing as opposed to the actual election day and how the votes are made on that day.

Is there a history to polls that shows polling is usually very accurate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I want too, but there is always a twinge of doubt
However, in the last few elections, I'd say as a whole they have been accurate in telling trends. I also recall that they were pretty accurate in 2004.
There is a list somewhere of which pollers did the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes....in fact... no candidate who has been down this much this close to election day has come back


harry Truman was down 4% with one week to go..... but no more polls were taken before the election and he won by a hair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. In 2004 the polls wer actually pretty accurate. I think one had Bush up by two
and he won by two. Of course, he stole Ohio but it was pretty accurate on everything else. The fact that Obama has a lead of 5 or more in almost every poll means it would be real hard to "steal" the election this time. Bradley effect too. It needs to be closer in the polls and it just is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. With all the shit the thugs are pulling, I take them with a truck of salt. The MoE around the poll
numbers should be small, but I trust them only to "generally reflect" the reality.

My personal MoE is about 8-10 points. For safety's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, I feel like invocation of the Double Super-Secret INTERNALS means nothing
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:30 PM
Original message
Polls are at best only accurate within the bounds of their stated uncertainty and confidence level
Confidence level is usually stated as 95%, which means that one time in 20 the real number will fall outside of the stated range (plus or minus whatever percentage points).

That's when the methodology (particularly the sampling procedure) is sound and executed correctly.

There is a lot that can go wrong with a poll. The only one that really matters is the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghurley Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. In NC I will believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Check it out
several polls were real close in 2004..Bush's final margin of victory was 2.4%

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. The trends are pretty obvious in all the polls. Obama was polling better this week
than a month ago. By a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Polls mean everything. The impact raising $, drawing crowds, getting good press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Polls are VERY important. Would McCain and Palin be in full meltdown mode
If not for the polls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wouldn't say they mean nothing at all.
Edited on Thu Oct-23-08 12:50 PM by kennetha
But they are kinda all over the map. So they can't ALL be accurate. It's like you're taking your temperature with a bunch of different thermometers and they all read something different. What do you believe?

Yesterday the national polls on RCP.com had the race as close as 1 pt and as high as 14 pt -- all in favor of Obama. Which to believe? I have no grounds for deciding. What about believing the average? That seems reasonable. But should all the polls count equally in calculating the average? Well, some of them must be WAY off. Should you give the ones that are weigh off the same weight as the ones that are closer? Obviously not. But how would you know in advance which ones to trust to what degree?

For sure, the 1% poll and the 14% poll each have a very good chance of being way off. But if one or the other of them is right, it is spot on and the other is the most extremely off. Do they have an equal chance of being spot on or spot off? Again, who knows?

I think you trust not any particular poll and not even the average of the polls to be a reliable predictor. Rather maybe you should look at them as models of what they race would be go under certain assumptions -- about who is voting in which proportions. I suspect that that's how you'd look at it if you were a candidate. Cause then the polls would tell you if you get this or that % of this or that demographic to get out and vote, then you win or lose by this or that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. A word about them saying they can do this: I do it too, even when we are losing
yeah, sometimes I give up the ghost but usually I let myself believe we can pull it off.

My philosophy is why be bummed out any sooner than I have to.

So...like in 2004 I read TIA religiously and cling to hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC