|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Infinite Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 11:53 AM Original message |
Has anyone read Article 1, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
1. Or John Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Doesn't Kerry fall under the same "restrictions?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. If he voted for the SOS pay increase - don't know if he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. It doesn't matter if he voted for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Then Kerry is in the same position. Funny little clause, but I get what they were thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Thought that the Cabinet raises were by Executive Order this time around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Were they? I must admit to paying no attention to things like that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
2. Saxbe fix. They just lower the salary back to where it was. First done by Taft in 1909. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Thank you for the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
3. No. Nobody reads that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
4. Don't forget to cite Article 3, Section 3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
5. She will be nominated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Just as the done deal is a wet dream of Hillary supporters and pundits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. I'm by no means a Hillary supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I agree - if he chooses her, he'll have an answer to this Constitutional kink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. i remember when theVP slot was a "done deal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Me too. imo this is the same situation - she is one of several he's considered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gravity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. The VP slot was never a done deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Seems like the same thing happening now - sure hasn't been announced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gravity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I bet money against my friend that Hillary wasn't going to be VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I wouldn't bet on it - there's a reason Richardson wasn't announced last week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. i hope you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
6. simplely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. It is amazing watching people so deep in denial. She is going to be nominated and no Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. I am not Hillary fan. But she will be nominated and be confirmed by voice vote. It's a lock! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
23. Can't wait to see your reaction when she is nominated. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
27. Bet all your money on Wes Clark. Then you'll stop thinking Wes Clark will in the Cabinet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC