Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Americablog's Aravosis: "The (Warren) decision was made by Obama himself, I'm told."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:46 AM
Original message
Americablog's Aravosis: "The (Warren) decision was made by Obama himself, I'm told."
Aravosis: "A powerful Democratic friend contacted me this morning to let me know that they talked to the key players yesterday, and Diane Feinstein, chair of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies, had nothing to do with the pick of Rick Warren as Obama's invocation speaker at the inaugural. The decision was made by Obama himself, I'm told, and Feinstein just assumed that he had vetted it with his staff. Difi went along with Obama's decision, not the other way around. If this is true, then our apologies to Senator Feinstein for suggesting that she was involved."

More: http://www.americablog.com/2008/12/feinstein-reportedly-had-nothing-to-do.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just what most of us figured -- except for a handful of apologists
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 10:02 AM by LostinVA
:sigh:

I was hoping I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. So who to believe, Aravosis or
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Explain to me where the two are contradictory.
Kthxbai.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Aravosis, hands down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. The specific machinations aside, if Obama did not want a given
participant to appear with him on that stage, it seems to me he is uniquely positioned to remove him or her.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4.  Obama himself said he would be responsible for his decisions so I don't see any altrnative but to
hold him responsible. This is no different than those he chose to campign alongside. I didn't like it then, and I don't like it now. I still consider it a slap in the face to both women and the GBTL Community. This is not a "petty " issue as framed by some. Civil Rights should be the cornerstone of our Democracy and not considered a "wedge issue".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. I never suspected Feinstein. She was with Milk when he was shot.
Anyway, I figured Obama decided. He's the decider now. (I don't mean to be derisive by putting it that way.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Please... Rick Warren is an OLD FRIEND of Obama's.
They didn't just meet at the Saddleback debate.

Obama even talks about his friendship with Warren in his book "The Audacity of Hope".

This one is pure Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Well, that's not exactly reassuring.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm glad if it's true Senator Feinstein was not involved, especially
after she recorded those No on 8 spots.

It would have made absolutely no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. I sincerely doubt Feinstein could give a
rat's ass who delivers the invocation which is generally sort of a generic Christian thing. This one has to be laid at Obama's feet. Horrible choice. An insult to gays, women, progressives in general. These mega church guys are a bunch of charletons out to sell their books and get rich off the sheep. That Warren has built his empire in the OC and caters to a bunch of repukes is just :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. you know what they say...

...mysogenist birds of a feather enforce patriarchal social structures together.

-just sayin'



study up, your gonna need it to survive this gang

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misogyny


especially love this part: "Feminist theorist Marilyn Frye argues that misogyny is phallogocentric and homoerotic at its root. In 'Politics of Reality', Fyre analyzes the alleged misogyny characteristic of the fiction and Christian apologetics of C.S. Lewis. Frye argues that such misogyny privileges the masculine as a subject of erotic attention. She compares the misogyny characteristic of Lewis' ideal of gender relations to underground male prostitution rings..."

--Jeff Gannon couldn't of said it better. 'I wanna be the psycho-sexual object of attention'

Desi, in fact and in deed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. Of course he did.
Why would anyone think otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. Of course he did -- he's been playing both sides against the middle from Day 1
I supported him because the alternative was so bad -- but I feel free to criticize him for stabbing us in the back the first chance he got.

And anyone who wants to accuse me of "whining" or who tells me to STFU -- can just go fuck themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. (shrug) Whoever made it, it's pretty shitty....
I wonder if we'll have to wait a-whole-nother day for DU's Next New Shiny Thing, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC