Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Yoo slams Obama for banning torture; implicates Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 08:27 PM
Original message
John Yoo slams Obama for banning torture; implicates Bush
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 08:27 PM by ProSense

Torture Lover John Yoo Excoriates Obama For Banning Torture

John Yoo, infamous author of the Bush administration legal memos authorizing the use of torture on suspected terrorists, slams President Obama for banning torture in a Wall Street Journal op-ed today, gravely warning that Obama “may have opened the door to further terrorist acts on U.S. soil.”

Throughout the article, Yoo insists that torture is America’s most effective weapon against terrorists and warns that without it, the U.S. will be incapable of intelligence-gathering:

Eliminating the Bush system will mean that we will get no more information from captured al Qaeda terrorists. Every prisoner will have the right to a lawyer (which they will surely demand), the right to remain silent, and the right to a speedy trial. <…>

Relying on the civilian justice system not only robs us of the most effective intelligence tool to avert future attacks, it provides an opportunity for our enemies to obtain intelligence on us.

Considering the Bush administration repeatedly insisted its use of coercive techniques was “limited,” it would be a far stretch even for loyal Bushies to suggest that torture is not the one and only method to obtaining information. And as ThinkProgress has made clear again and again, numerous intelligence experts and real interrogators agree that, far from being “the most effective intelligence tool,” torture simply doesn’t work.

<...>

UPDATE Yoo also makes it perfectly clear that Bush himself directly and explicitly ordered torture, including the waterboarding of at least three detainees:

What is needed are the tools to gain vital intelligence, which is why, under President George W. Bush, the CIA could hold and interrogate high-value al Qaeda leaders. On the advice of his intelligence advisers, the president could have authorized coercive interrogation methods like those used by Israel and Great Britain in their antiterrorism campaigns. (He could even authorize waterboarding, which he did three times in the years after 9/11.)



Another blatant admission of war crimes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh goodie... they're starting to turn on each other.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yoo teaches at UC Berkeley? ick... oh & he implicates B*sh for waterboarding
and I just saw O'Reilly offer Rove a place to hide in tunnels there at FAUX NOISE and Rove got upset a little and said he doesn't need to hide! Olbermann came back on and said, "they don't have any tunnels, it's a just an escape hatch for female producers"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well I might as well be the first on this thread to say it:
FUCK YOO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yoo Bush & Cheney must really feel that they're justified for torture
despite what the law says. I mean they honestly believe they were doing the right thing. There's no other explanation for them being as blunt as they've been with their admissions of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Nope, I don't believe that they "honestly believe" anything. And there is another
explanation for their blatant admissions. Pelosi and others have guaranteed immunity to the top Bushwhacks. That's why Bush didn't pardon anybody. He and the chief Dark Lords of Bushwhackdom are out of the woods. Impeachment off the table; also prosecution. I suspect that it was a deal for no nuking of Iran, and leaving the White House peacefully when the time came (and getting rid of Rumsfeld). Maybe they thought they were doing the right thing (some of them). Armageddon vs. end of the rule of law. What's to choose? But primarily such a deal--if true--protects the war machine and its profiteers from us pitchfork-minded Americans.

You think that anything Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld did was to "keep us safe"? I don't. I think they were covering their tracks to 9/11, and accomplishing other self-serving purposes, with torture, indefinite detention, rendition and murdering prisoners.

The only thing they believe in is acquiring as much money and power as possible. They are complete traitors to the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well Fuck Yoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Keith Olbermann said tonight that this is how all forms of torture should be referred to
forevermore:

They should forever be labeled "The Bush System."

Very appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rationalizing doing something illegal is an admission of guilt.
I hope somebody is keeping track of this stuff for later prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. YOO hasn't figured out that this admission can be used as
evidence! geeze....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC