Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm convinced that the cable news channels are not about news at all

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:51 PM
Original message
I'm convinced that the cable news channels are not about news at all
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 02:53 PM by EraOfResponsibility
but about entertainment. That's why it's no thing for them to invite nothing but Republicans to their shows that talk shit about the Stim bill. Because it's show business to them, and they need an antagonist for their political soap opera. They don't give a damn about keeping ANYONE honest, it's all for show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. BINGO FOR YOU, REMEMBER THE MEDIA ARE THE PROPAGANDISTS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ratings bring in the advertiser's money; noone is going to mess with that, least of all the media
owners. Do a little research on Rupert Murdock and the picture becomes even clearer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Um, yeah.
You see those commercial breaks? That's your first clue that a given product's primary incentive is to draw and keep as many viewers as possible by whatever means necessary. Sometimes that means to find the story and present it honestly. Sometimes that means to distort. Sometimes that means to throw news out the window and discuss women with kids or missing women or women whose kids are missing or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. sorry for stating the obvious. Just had a moment of clarity, I guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Sorry for any hostility I displayed there. Didn't mean to convey that. My error. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. so stop watching, cable "opinion" and that's what it is, there are very few actual just news
broadcasts have 24/7 to fill so yes they'll keep on having the Red Menace on to fill time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. We have a winner! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. You have reach what Joseph Campbell refers to as the
eternal state of bliss and understanding.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. they are so pissed at Obama's approval ratings right now
They can't believe their bullshit isn't touching him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do you notice those things that run between "news" segments? They are called commercials.
The reason those shows are on is so they can sell commercials. Otherwise nobody would bother.

Same with newspapers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Anna Nicole Smith, Paris Hilton
Those two names say it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. don't forget who helped the trend though, The Menendez Brothers and the Long island Lolita.
that's when CNN officially lost any and all credibility and then they blew up when OJ happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. forgot the originial - OJ on the freeway!
That's what did it for me. Haven't watched cnn since that night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. *nods at all the responses*
yep. Ya'll are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. This all started years ago when the various networks began putting their News divisions underneath
their large "Entertainment" umbrella.

That's when they made the conscious decision to care more about ratings than reporting 'uncomfortable' stories and facts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. I love when they wonder aloud if a story has legs.
I'm assuming they just haven't decided yet if they're going to pound the story into the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. I remember a time when CNN could deliver the news and still be commercial until
corporations that had nothing to do with media started buying out our TV and cable channels. Then it changed. I don't know why Turner had to sell CNN, but I think it's because Ruppert Murdoch arrived on the scene with his tabloid, entertainment brand of "news" and Turner couldn't compete in good conscience. When new owners Time Warner/AOL arrived, they tried to out fox, FOX News by imitating its format. No conscience there to get in the way of ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Of course they aren't . They are about ad dollars.
they are going to show what brings eyeballs to the set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. I don't think they're commercially viable in the long run.
I don't see how carrying water for an unpopular president (B*sh) and now bashing a popular one can be the most commercially astute option in terms of maximising the demographics.

I always switch off as soon as they go negative (that's why I can't watch F** News for more than 30 seconds) and I only tend to watch when they have live feeds of Democratic speeches or announcements.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. BINGO, YOU WIN!!!!!!
You're kidding, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. They stopped being news when they stopped subsidizing
the news room and required it to MAKE MONEY. And that happened many years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC