|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:25 PM Original message |
So, after Krugman is taken down, what other lefty voices should be silenced? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. Butter in the middle and on top, and a large Mountain Dew for me..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. You dammit!! Down with Zenlitened!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. There are also some people so "enarmored" with Krugman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imperialism Inc. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Krugman Shmugman. I don't need Krugram to tell me what is plainly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. I don't need anyone to tell me that Krugman can't be certain Obama's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. The plan isn't out yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imperialism Inc. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
37. The link below is subscription only . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 01:21 AM Response to Reply #22 |
64. You've already asked for and been given the details.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. I'll criticize Krugman all day long - but Obama too if I think he's fucking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Mission accomplished. The Bush Depression... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. Is Krugman going to stop writing his column or something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Not necessary, once his character's been assassinated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. So you are saying that people cannot disagree with Mr. Krugman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. Hmmm... perhaps I'm being too subtle here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
45. The PP shuns subtlety. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imperialism Inc. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
6. Dean Baker is up next. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-23-09 08:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
91. DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. Howard Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
9. Frank Rich! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. hope you're got to stop him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
11. Matt Taibbi and Glenn Greenwald are next. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Why can't these folks be criticized, considering that they do their fair share? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Not at all, they are definitely open to criticism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Perhaps these are the growing transition of going from an administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-23-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #20 |
87. Strawman and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camera obscura (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
50. Taibbi is not on the same level as Greenwald or Krugman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 06:12 AM Response to Reply #50 |
68. i don't understand that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camera obscura (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #68 |
78. I'm all for caustic and visceral, I just think he does it badly. He is not as clever as he thinks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-23-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #78 |
86. then it's a matter of taste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
12. next...off with Frank RIch's head ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. But wait - I thought criticism was PATRIOTIC? HAHAAHAHA!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. But don't you understand, there's a conspiracy, I tell ya! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imperialism Inc. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. I don't think the poster is complaining about criticism of Krugman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. BWAHAHAAHAHA!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imperialism Inc. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. There is a difference between rational criticism and knee jerk reactions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Please stop. I can't take the irony. I'm meeeelllllttttiiiinnnggg!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imperialism Inc. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:09 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I think the problem is your reading comprehension. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
57. Maybe that's the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 03:08 AM Response to Reply #29 |
67. and if perchance there are any profits they get way more than 3%, something like 17x leverage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 01:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
65. uhh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 02:07 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Too true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uberllama42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:16 AM Response to Reply #13 |
73. First of all, Krugman is not president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
18. oh there's plenty of people who'll babble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Agreed, no dissent EVER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
58. Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
53. Zing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
21. Deleted message |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
24. Anyone who dares criticize Obama's corporate masters should be silenced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Yes, No Dissent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:56 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. +3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Or is it anyone who dares criticize Krugman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
79. With whom are you in lockstep? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:08 PM Response to Reply #24 |
59. Who's been silenced? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 12:44 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. You won't get a response, it's the inflamed rhetoric in the accusation that matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 01:06 AM Response to Reply #59 |
62. "should" is a word that has a meaning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 11:12 AM Response to Reply #24 |
77. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
26. I love Krugman, he's been correct for a long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
30. Anyone that Wall Street representatives dictate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RollWithIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
34. Watching people express outrage at criticism of anyone, Obama, columnists, TV people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
38. Krugman spent the nineties excoriating the left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. He was a big Clinton Supporter......during the primaries...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Bill Clinton deregulated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:30 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. He didn't do it alone. Actually, the Republican congress wrote up the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. See...he can't be trusted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:32 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Oh, can the self-righteous bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:44 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. oh, my a hero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 06:21 AM Response to Reply #52 |
69. If you've really struggled through the trenches, why do you carry right wing's water? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #48 |
85. good post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-23-09 08:29 PM Response to Reply #38 |
89. Krugman has always been a leftist, big union supporter, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
46. Well..K.O, no doubt...Rachel Maddow...the ACLU...Glenn Greenwald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
49. Wait. Expressing disagreement with Krugman = Silencing him. WTF!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. Blame the ocelots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
51. rec#8 here, but.... Krugman is NOT taken down, in any way, shape... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
55. This idiocy knows no bounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
60. Oh geez. Its called debate. Some people cannot handle it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
63. All of em. Let's go to work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
70. Krugman compared Obama's supporters to Nixon's people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:18 AM Response to Reply #70 |
75. and a nobel prize. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:25 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. That is not all that impressive, his dishonest use of hyperbole is far more telling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
71. Is it "Build your own Strawman" night? Why didn't anyone tell me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:10 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. You think he would be an expert after constructing so many strawmen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
74. do you think some random anti-intellectual idiots on du can really take krugman down? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
80. Yeah the death squads are warming up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
81. Lots of people would like to shut up Al Gore - maybe we could glom on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
82. Who the fuck wants to silence Krugman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
83. Just got off the phone with Krugman. He said he's never heard of DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
84. Who is silencing him? Every other thread is about him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-23-09 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
88. He's got the microphone... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-23-09 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
90. I'd like to see him taken down... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-23-09 09:00 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. I don't think that they are putting him on a pedestal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-23-09 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
92. Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC