Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Playing Devil's Advocate: Obama Passed the Buck

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Crooked Moon Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:10 PM
Original message
Playing Devil's Advocate: Obama Passed the Buck
the AG serves, as an appointed officeholder, at the pleasure of the president. as such, his or her loyalties reside in some gray area between upholding the letter of the law and supporting the president.

the gloating around here seems a bit premature, as it is conceivable that obama could privately express his unwillingness to prosecute and leave it to holder to find an escape hatch, making him the public lightning rod for criticism and mealy-mouthing.

the gloaters, who see this as masterful chess-playing by the president, might well come to find they were ooo-ing and aah-ing over s single move and not see the bigger game at all.

prosecute somebody and i'll eat crow.
but a cute PR move does little for me.

holder's history suggests he'll bend over backwards to please the president (see "marc rich").

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Aren't you the clever one.
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 06:12 PM by Avalux
NOT. Devil's Advocate my ass.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. check out the constitution, then get back to us nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Article II, Section 2
"he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices"

Your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. No. The Justice Department should act as an independent body
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 06:14 PM by Thrill
Although The President is the AG's boss. This is the right protocol for pursuing legal actions. Holder should decide whether to prosecute or investigate someone or not. The WH politicizing and running the DOJ is what went on during the Bush yrs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Passed the buck...to the man whose job it is to actually do prosecutions?
Go hook up with brent. You guys would get along great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. whatever Obama thinks
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 06:18 PM by ErinBerin84
I guess we should just hope that the AG makes the right decision. Howard Fineman was on Hardball tonight seeming to say what you are implying and that the wh is just doing this to scapegoat, but on Countdown last night he was saying that he wasn't scapegoating this to Holder because it isn't his style to "pass the buck". Kind of a direct contradiction. And by the way Fineman talked about the prosecutions tonight, it definitely seemed like he's part of the media club that is against investigations. Since Fineman has been off before, I won't trust what he says.....hopefully good comes out of this, I'm going to refrain from characterizing until the full game plays out I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. ...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jewishlibrl Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Very good points
And I'd like to add that it's possible that President Obama may have told Rahm and Gibbs that he opposed prosecuting Bush officials, and backtracked when a storm ensued. That possibility must not be discarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hmm.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I'm not sure
what Obama thinks should be done, but the Newsweek article about Holder seriously considering prosecutions went online on Saturday, while the Rahm and Gibbs comments were on Sunday/Monday. Not sure about whether it's just good cop/bad cop or a disagreement, but that's how it went in terms of timelines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yeah, Obama is weak that way. Scared of his own shadow I think.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Oh, fuck that..you
don't know what the fuck you're going on about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. that's a plausible scenario
Edited on Wed Apr-22-09 04:37 AM by Skittles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, if you want to be a dumb
fuck advocate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL:
The position of Attorney General was created by the Judiciary Act of 1789. In June 1870 Congress enacted a law entitled “An Act to Establish the Department of Justice.” This Act established the Attorney General as head of the Department of Justice and gave the Attorney General direction and control of U.S. Attorneys and all other counsel employed on behalf of the United States. The Act also vested in the Attorney General supervisory power over the accounts of U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals.

The mission of the Office of the Attorney General is to supervise and direct the administration and operation of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Bureau of Prisons, Office of Justice Programs, and the U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals Service, which are all within the Department of Justice.

The principal duties of the Attorney General are to:

    Represent the United States in legal matters.

    Supervise and direct the administration and operation of the offices, boards, divisions, and bureaus that comprise the Department.

    Furnish advice and opinions, formal and informal, on legal matters to the President and the Cabinet and to the heads of the executive departments and agencies of the government, as provided by law.

    Make recommendations to the President concerning appointments to federal judicial positions and to positions within the Department, including U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals.

    Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate.

    Perform or supervise the performance of other duties required by statute or Executive Order.


http://www.usdoj.gov/jmd/mps/manual/ag.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Unfair characterization
I'm one who has questioned Obama's point of view on this subject. But I'm not sure it's fair to use such an expression. About the strongest point of view I might express is that he felt the whole thing was spinning out of control and he should let this be handled at the AG level. By weighing in personally, he was placing the presidency smack in the middle of the conflict, bringing with it all manner of implications. At worse, it was spilling an internal conflict out into the public. And possibly, it was causing him to take positions, before the AG had been given an opportunity to establish more formal opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. You're full of it. It's not worth the time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh for heaven's sakes . . . don't you have anything better to do?
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 07:11 PM by emulatorloo
Shouldn't you be taking the dogs out or going to the grocery store or doing something constructive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Here is an argument that I admit is bad." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. Devil's Advocate???
This sounds like lost in translation, looks like you're searching for ideas.

Why would the President doing the right things makes him look as if he is passing
the buck? what? are you suggesting this is too big a job for Holder????

Either that or you're looking for a new talking point, oh! by the way, Obama never
mentioned anything about prosecuting,only the media and republicans assumes he was
not going to when Rahm and Gibbs said something about looking forward.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. He facilitated appointing a Special Prosecutor. That goes through the Justice Dept.
I bask in your pessimism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sayeth the fool who has no idea what the DoJ is *supposed* to be like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
23. Write 100 times: There are 3 branches of the Federal government, and they are...
Executive, Legislative, and Judicial, and the Constitution gives them equal powers.

Which one do you think SHOULD be making decisions about investigating and prosecuting crimes?

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC