ABC - "EPA's Greenhouse Gas Mandate Causes Both Joy and Concern"

[TomCADem]

Oh nooess! I know a lot of born again right wingers will now be denouncing the consequences of the EPA's determination, and how it might lead to (horror of horrors) mandated regulations and restrictions on the emission of green house gases.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/GlobalWarming/story?id=7364713&page=1

###

"EPA's Greenhouse Gas Mandate Causes Both Joy and Concern"

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that carbon dioxide, and five other greenhouse gases spewing out of tailpipes, "endanger public health and welfare" of the American people. These gases, they said, contribute to climate change, which is causing more heat waves, droughts and flooding, and is threatening food and water supplies.

The EPA's mandate is a critical step toward amending climate change regulations. It gives President Obama the ammunition, under the 40-year-old Clean Air Act, to order emissions reductions and tighten regulations. That could include measures such as requiring more fuel-efficiency in cars and less carbon dioxide emission at plants and industries.

* * *

But it is also already causing an uproar in the business community. Critics say the administration's actions could cost jobs -- as many as two million -- and drive up energy prices. There also is concern that it will lead to government regulation of office buildings, planes, ships, farms, even cows, which are big methane gas producers.

"If they decide to ... regulate under the Clean Air Act, that literally puts EPA in charge of entire economy," said Bill Kovacs, vice president for the Environment, Technology and Regulatory Affairs Division at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

"It would be a disaster," he added. "They're trying to pressure Congress and the business community to do something that they would really rather not do, because they also know that there is a risk that this regulatory cascade will actually go into effect."

###

[BeyondGeography]

1. The problem with the "business community" is they have cried wolf so many times

treating each and every rule and regulation as a Twilight of the Gods moment, that it's impossible to take them seriously. If we had heeded their each and every warning, we'd still be fighting slavery.

[leddytech]

2. That conflicts with...

http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/Scientists+pull+about+face+global+warming/2010571/story.html

"Latif is one of the leading climate modellers in the world. He is the recipient of several international climate-study prizes and a lead author for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He has contributed significantly to the IPCC's last two five-year reports that have stated unequivocally that man-made greenhouse emissions are causing the planet to warm dangerously.

Yet last week in Geneva, at the UN's World Climate Conference--an annual gathering of the so-called "scientific consensus" on man-made climate change --Latif conceded the Earth has not warmed for nearly a decade and that we are likely entering "one or even two decades during which temperatures cool.""

[kestrel91316]

3. Thank you for your concern. Where and when did you get your PhD in climatology?

[boppers]

4. Psst. Climate shifts cause both cooling and warming, in different areas.

The "North Atlantic", which is what Latif was talking about, isn't the whole planet... and the reporter then mis-interpreted his work for obvious political/editorial reasons.