Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clearly the Nobel damaged the President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fugop Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:11 PM
Original message
Clearly the Nobel damaged the President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know, people should click the link,
or at least read the whole post before they unrec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. There are some folks on board this morning that need a hug.
:toast: :toast: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Some of them probably unrec'd because it WASN'T bad news
for the President.

It's jacked up like that around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't really believe that.
I think a lot of the people here at DU that have problems with the President are sincere people with honest issues.

You can criticise the President without hating him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. A lot may be, and in my opinion, a few are not
based on patterns of comments I've seen.

I just don't think that unrecs on positive threads are 100% attributable to the obvious boogeymen that are trolls and Freeper agitators, that's all. JMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. You are correct.
Among the extremely jealous, Obama has been damaged. You would have thought that he couldn't have been any worse in their eyes, but envy is a perennial crop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. To be against a Nobel Peace Prize winner is to be against good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yeah, this can be boiled down pretty far.
That's a completely fair statement - worth repeating!

I think we're seeing jealousy on parade because of Obama's next award. I'm glad some Dems are starting to talk back, and point out the hysterical hypocrisy of the "Country First" :sarcasm: crowd. I'm glad we have the likes of Alan Grayson - "if Obama had a BLT for lunch today, the republi-CONS would try to ban bacon." And Hillary, pointing out that "if Obama walked on water, john bolton would say it's because he couldn't swim." We need more points like that being made out loud, in public, on mic, on camera, in blogs, etc. EVERYWHERE. I'm glad there are people now making them. In another thread here the talk was of the Dems finally getting "uppity" with a chorus of hallelujahs and amens following it. I certainly added mine there, too!

It's long past time this point was made all over the place til it becomes absorbed into the pores of the national zeitgeist. Robert Heinlein's novel, "Stranger in a Strange Land", frequently mentioned the theme of "grokking." "To grok" means to understand something so intimately and thoroughly that you have almost literally eaten it. You've consumed it totally. And in one sense in the novel, it was literal. The ultimate union or melding - where the thing or concept you've come to understand this intensely has literally become part of you. You've internalized it to that extent.

That's the level of penetration we need to seek - in planting these seeds and memes!

Everyone must grok this idea - that "to be against a Nobel Peace Prize winner is to be against good."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fugop Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Faith returns
Time and again, the media seems to join together and try throwing some blood in the water to stir up the sharks. All last year, they never failed to disappoint, from "He's an empty-suit celebrity!" to "Lipstick on a pig!" to "Bill Ayers!" and so on and so forth. But while the teabag types fall victim to the feeding frenzy, it seems that the majority of Americans really are seeing through it. We voted for Obama in November, in spite of being told in September that the masterful Sarah Palin had changed the game. After every debate, the spinners tried to tell us how great McCain and Palin did, only to have the instapolls come up again and again with the decisive winners on the Democratic side. And now, even as the media tries desperately to sway us into believing that the Nobel is a horrible thing for the President to win, it doesn't seem to be working. At least not yet. I'm keeping the faith. The media really is fast becoming a callback to "The Boy who Cried Wolf." They just yap and yap and yap about this or that crisis for Obama. And Americans are tuning them out. Yay for us. I hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Thank you! Well said and wish it were an OP. n/t
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 01:37 PM by Kind of Blue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. It is conceivable that GOP Joe and his crew were wrong when
they declared that there was no upside for the President in winning the Nobel Prize. I wonder if these fools realize how stupid most of their pronouncements are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC