|
|
|
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
PBS Poll-435
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:04 PM Original message |
| Poll question: Would Terry McAuliffe have won in Virginia? |
| Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| |
| Captain Hilts
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. No. And neither would Moran. Kaine won because Kilgore insulted voters last week of the campaign. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Jennicut
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Maybe but why can't VA get a good liberal to run as a Dem? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Yes. Conservative is the default. Ask Henry Howell supporters. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. Up until Obama took the state, it'd been decades since it turned blue. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Jennicut
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. Oh well. We did our best then. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. Yes. Including the military who saw the wars badly managed. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 9. Tell that to Tim Kaine, Jim Webb, and Mark Warner |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. Webb's opponent committed political suicide. Being a Marine and Reagan Admin official also helped. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 28. All the other Republcians were afraid to run against Warner |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. None of whom I'd call a "Strong Liberal" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 13. But they did turn the state blue |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ShortnFiery
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 24. Yes, but a sickly shade of greenish corporate-blue at the expense of the Working Class. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 29. The working class elected these guys |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ShortnFiery
|
Wed Nov-04-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 35. All the more tragic. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Sebastian Doyle
|
Wed Nov-04-09 11:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 37. Working class? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ShortnFiery
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 21. Yes, we're all in love with conservative blue dogs within our party. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 27. For some reason voters seem to like them |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| depakid
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 25. The state is chock full of fundies and military personnel |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SCRUBDASHRUB
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:42 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 33. This Virginian isn't a fundie. No military in my immediate family. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AllentownJake
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. No and he'd make us all embarrassed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 17. I find a 19% loss rather embarrassing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AllentownJake
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 19. Well do that and have Terry on Morning Joe the next day |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
amandabeech
|
Wed Nov-04-09 07:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 31. What bad economy? Obama has this well in hand! Happy days are here again! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. He'd have done a lot better than Deeds. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
countingbluecars
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. I've lived in Virginia |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Frances
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 15. I agree with you |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
countingbluecars
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 26. I remember in the early 80's |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 07:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 30. Most of my long term Dem friends sorta looked upon |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| onehandle
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Probably not, but it would have been a Hell of a lot closer. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. Probably not, but he would have run a real campaign |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ShortnFiery
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. No, but JIM MORAN would have brought out our base. Too bad that carpetbagger McAulliffe ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SCRUBDASHRUB
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:44 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 34. Brian Moran was running in the primary, not Jim. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ShortnFiery
|
Wed Nov-04-09 10:33 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 36. Oops! Thanks. I stand corrected. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| AspenRose
|
Thu Nov-05-09 12:39 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 39. That's exactly what happened. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| argonaut
(103 posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. Nah, McDonnell was too good a candidate. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
PBS Poll-435
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 23. Even with his thesis? It should have been his "Macaca" moment |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Renew Deal
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. He would have lost AND embarrased the party. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
saltpoint
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. He was trounced in the primary and would have fared |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RollWithIt
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. Maybe, maybe not, but he would have been a better candidate... nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 40. Terry and any other Democrat would have run into the same problem |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SoCalDem
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 41. Snuffleuphagus McAuliffe? nope.. he's a greasy guy..too "connected" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Perky
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 42. Carpetbagging snakeoil saleman is a hard persona to diowon |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Blue_Tires
|
Thu Nov-05-09 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 43. unsure now; but i'm leaning toward no... | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| S_E_Fudd
|
Thu Nov-05-09 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 44. Possibly...he certainly would have come closer...nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Nov 23rd 2009, 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC