Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I understand the frustration, but why lump folks like Barbara Lee in with Blue Dogs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:16 PM
Original message
I understand the frustration, but why lump folks like Barbara Lee in with Blue Dogs?
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 04:18 PM by CreekDog
and call their whole effort a failure?

okay, if it fails, it's true they all sort of own that, but is that really helpful?

is there any doubt that a bill written by a Barbara Lee, Pete Stark, Raul Grijalva, or Jan Schakowski would be a great bill?

is there any doubt that a bill written by Jim Cooper or Bart Stupak would be a great bill?

so why are so many treating folks in the first group with the same contempt as the second group?

is the first group really the problem?

George Miller D-CA (from the Bay Area) is in the leadership and is as pro consumer, pro choice and as liberal as any and he told Ezra Klein, that they weren't going to allow the Stupak Amendment to be voted on but they then would not have had the votes to pass a health care bill at all.

I don't know how you lay this at progressives' feet. They were looking at the whole thing going down in flames as it has each time it's been attempted. Meanwhile you hear veterans of those earlier fights lamenting that had not taken what they could get instead of holding out for a better outcome which never materialized.

So with that knowledge, most of the most liberal members of the house, in fact, probably all but two, voted in favor of the bill.

i don't see those members as owning the failures of this bill.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because the Democratic Leadership is choosing to turn the Party
into a Conseradem Party. They believe liberals are expendable, and have no where else to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This party has the same problem now that it did under Clinton
It is once again the party of Wall Street.

We may get our way on social issues but make no mistake, the rule of the day with both parties is very conservative when it come to economics.

My personal take is that the economic and the social are one in the same. You can't really seperate the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Name names
you say the leadership as if all are equally complicit and have the same thoughts on the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. it's all a conspiracy you see. seriously i think people are literally losing their minds.
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 04:46 PM by dionysus
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Their voices are all equally lacking.
They own it all and let the messages get corrupted. Concessions are made to other Dems, no need for the repuke conservatives to even make an effort. They just sit back and bark NO!, while the conservative Dems get conservatives concessions.

I don't see any Democratic leaders standing up for the liberal positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. i'm a member of the party and i don't agree with you
do you think your voice should carry unilaterally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think our voices should be equally heard.
I also think the tent may have gotten too big. Maintaining power seems to be the primary objective. And, to do it, the party bends to the blue dogs, thinking that is the only way. The entire party shifted to the right, instead of the blue dogs getting in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. fine, but when the Blue Dogs won't vote with you, what can you pass?
Say we get a really excellent bill and it gets 180 votes, then what?

Give up?

Do you know anything about George Miller? Back in 1994, as a member of the leadership, implored the leadership to make badly needed changes or they were going to get their asses kicked in the elections. He was right, they didn't listen and all our asses were kicked.

What I'm saying is that they aren't the monolith that you say they are and identifying who is the problem would be helpful, because if you get rid of them all and replace them with the same combination of folks, you are going to be in the same boat, whereas, if you get rid of those who are the problem and replace them with folks who will act differently --well, you might actually accomplish something.

sadly, your broad brush can't help do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. it's just mindless lashing out at this point. i can't tell if it's sincere anymore,
or if people are so investing in this failing they'll trash anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who's sour on Barbara Lee?
That's purity silly season, just like the teabaggers/freepers feeling the need to boot Kit Bond and Newt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC