Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry said he'd pick a NSA if election was close

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
zapped 1 Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 05:20 AM
Original message
Kerry said he'd pick a NSA if election was close
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 05:25 AM by zapped 1
I remember him saying right before the election that one big mistake Al Gore made was in not picking a cabinet while the election battle was going on. Bush did this which gave the illusion of the election going to him.
He added that he's pick a National Security Advisor immedeatly following the election if it was close or shady.

Does anyone
a) think that he already secretly did so

b) offer any opinions on picking a National Security Advisor first?
(my guess would be the Constitutional Crises issue)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. it wouldn't have made any difference if Gore had
the f**king court would have ruled the same way.

The illusion of the election going to Bush was caused by the fact that he had more votes than Gore in Florida out of the ones they actually bothered to count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zapped 1 Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. if did give Bush some PR momentum...
...would you agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sure I guess
but he's have been selected and sworm in regarless. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadicalMom Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Right now it seems pointless. The steam has gone out of this...
I hope there is some big secret plan to go forth and make a real stand, but I think everyone with any power, including Kerry, has bailed on it. I would so like to be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. From the Newsweek Article
In the heady days before the election, Kerry's top aides sat around picking a cabinet (one plan was to ask Colin Powell to stay on as secretary of State, thereby avoiding a massive power struggle between Sen. Joe Biden and Democratic foreign-policy wise man Richard Holbrooke). Nowadays the foreign-policy team still meets on the assumption that it could be reconstituted for '08. But the reality is, "it's mostly sitting around some lawyer's office and asking each other if we've heard about jobs," says a member of the team. As for Kerry, says this adviser, "he thinks he's the front runner for '08 without recognizing that he needs to do some soul-searching. If he wants to come back, he'll have to come back as a different candidate, not the stiff who plays it safe and takes four sides of every issue."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6777696/site/newsweek/

That's all I could find about Kerry's would-be cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Could this unnamed adviser be Karl Rove?
The same old M.O. Quotes from faceless assholes who always have something very negative to say. You almost never hear quotes like these from the Bush junta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zapped 1 Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. screw the newweek article
i appreciate your input but that article is nearly two months old and only relevant in the timing in which it was released.

what i am referring to was a Kerry discussing the 2000 election before the 2004 election. It was when everyone in the MSM was predicting that this election was going to be worse than 2000 in the legal sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. The difference is Bush made it very public in 2000...
...and Kerry, true to nature, is laying low. In 2000, one of the ways that Bush-Cheney Inc created an air of inevitability was by publicly starting the appointment process. With Kerry, we're listening to the crickets chirp.

sigh

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MandateThis Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. You Bet! I'm sure he's ready! He wanted this job all his life!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC