Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep Taylor's NO vote on CAFTA changed by glitch to YES

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 08:59 AM
Original message
Rep Taylor's NO vote on CAFTA changed by glitch to YES
Rep Taylor's NO vote on CAFTA changed by glitch to YES

Taylor's `no' vote on free trade pact goes uncounted

published: July 29, 2005 6:00 am
ASHEVILLE � Rep. Charles Taylor says an electronic glitch kept
his vote against the controversial Central American Free Trade
Agreement from registering, but his explanation hasn't stopped
criticism from some Democrats....

Potter said House members have electronic cards that allow them to
vote from another location when they can't make it to the House
floor.

"At the terminal where he put his card in and voted, he voted
no," Potter said.

The machine apparently recorded Taylor's vote as an invalid card,
according to Brian Walsh, press secretary for Congressman Bob Ney.
Ney's office oversees the House Clerk's Office

http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?
AID=/20050729/NEWS01/50728044/1001

or
http://tinyurl.com/9oa4j
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. So now what!!!!????!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. bad headline
The headline is actually "Taylor’s ‘no’ vote on free trade pact goes uncounted."

This is important because if his 'no' vote were changed to a 'yes,' then the final vote would have been 216-216, a tie. Since his 'no' vote went uncounted, the vote would have been 217-216 if his vote had been properly counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. he says glitch
In the article it is blamed on a glitch.


"Rep. Charles Taylor says an electronic glitch kept
his vote against the controversial Central American Free Trade
Agreement from registering, but his explanation hasn't stopped
criticism from some Democrats...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. sorry, see what you say
you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. still, I agree with the main point
This plus

"In addition to Taylor, Rep. Jo Ann Davis, a Virginia Republican, also planned to vote against the measure. But Davis was traveling in her district and failed to get back in time."

makes for a very suspicious scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another Repub (article doesn't say who )claims she wanted to vote no
Edited on Fri Jul-29-05 09:20 AM by wishlist
This article mentions another Repub who says she intended to vote no but couldn't get there in time. There is another thread describing how Repub Robin Hayes of N.C. who opposed CAFTA voted yes instead of no at the last minute after being convinced by Hastert that lost jobs problem would be looked into. Some funny stuff by Repubs at the last minutes that managed to slide this through.

"The controversial trade bill narrowly passed the U.S. House early Thursday by a vote of 217-215. With Taylor’s vote, the measure still would have passed, but only by one vote. Another Republican House member said she planned to vote against the measure, but didn’t make it back from her district in time."

Dem challenger Heath Shuler is doing a good job getting TV and print coverage of Taylor's puzzling failure to vote no:

"Swain County Democrat Heath Shuler said Taylor “gave us his word that he would vote against CAFTA, and I don’t understand why he did not.”

http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050729/NEWS01/50728044/1001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkon Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Did she have an electronic card?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. this House of Representatives vote brought to you by Diebold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Does this make two or three voting "glitches" now reported on CAFTA?
If we now have enough voting glitches (not "changes of heart" or "failure to vote" but actual "glitches") now reported to have reversed the outcome, this becomes a major story and something that Pelosi et al could make hay with, IMHO.

I would try to answer the question myself, but I can't get DU's "simple search" function to work today. Anyone out there know the answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC