Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can a man and woman married to each other be excommunicated for having sex with each other?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:07 PM
Original message
Can a man and woman married to each other be excommunicated for having sex with each other?
Suppose that it is discovered that one of them is infertile. If the justification for sex is reproduction, then what is their justification for having sex after they know that they cannot reproduce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess the church can do whatever it wants...
as ridiculous as it gets about these kinds of things. I knew a woman who had been married for 3 years, and then divorced. A year later the Catholic diocese sent her a letter asking if she would agree to an annulment of the marriage (saying that it never existed) in order that her ex-husband might have a Catholic Wedding with a new bride...and, thus get around the "not marrying anyone who has been divorced" rule.

She refused. The church gave him the annulment anyway.

How hypocritical is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They didn't need to ask her...
Annullments don't work like a divorce. They don't need to have informed consent of both parties. It's a decree by the church saying that certain aspects of marriage are missing in order to consider the marriage a sacrament.

You either believe it or you don't. I have no problem with the existence of annulments or Decrees of Nullity (slightly different. That's saying a marriage is not a valid sacrament if not performed in the Catholic Church). I do, however, think both are misused, as any societal construct.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I still think it's hypocritical bullshit to get around
the "divorce" question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. A lot of people do
and when put into practice, I suppose that it's often abused. But, you still need to get a civil divorce in the USA if you want to remarry legally. The Annulment doesn't count for jack squat in the eyes of our laws.

And our legal divorces don't count for jack squat in the eyes of the Catholic Church.

(I've obtained both a legal divorce and a Decree of Nullity after my first marriage.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Gauger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. That's bullshit.
The marriage did indeed exist. You can't just sign a paper that says otherwise and make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's not so much saying
that the marriage didn't exist, though that's how people like to explain it. An annulment actually means that the marriage didn't meet the church's criteria for a sacrament, so it's not binding by church law.

A Decree of Nullity means that the marriage was never performed as a sacrament within the catholic church, so a sacramental marriage is now allowed within church doctrinal beliefs.

They are slightly different things. I'm not making a judgment either way on the two things. Just saying what they are and how they are used by the church.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. In the Catholic "Church", you can get married if you're infertile, but not if you're impotent.
There was a documentary about a South American couple that the "church" did that to a few years back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nope
AFAIK, excommunication requires some kind of malicious intent -- or writing a book of theology that the Doctors of the Church dislike.

Plus, the issue has been ruled on by church law -- several times.

It's tough to get excommunicated in the RC church, and excommunication is easily rescinded. The priests and bishops that go around excommunicating members for things like supporting right-to-choose laws are quite frequently overruled.

For more details, you'd have to check a theological website, perhaps one of the Vatican's.

No, the church is not a paragon of rationality, but it's not entirely heavy-handed.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. why would they be excommunicated?
do you mean divorced?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nope...
They can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Beasides, reproduction is not the sole justification for sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Which church?
If you mean the RCC, then the answer is no. If you mean the Eastern Orthodox Church, then the answer is no. I'm not sure which other churches excommunicate, per se, but honestly, I can't think of any that would.

In the Eastern Orthodox Church, our theology says that sex is not solely for procreation as it is not a sin. We have a different take on it than the Western churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. You DO come up with the weirdest questions, Boojatta
and not just on this forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. I asked the pope.
He told me, "Don't worry none dog.....just keep on gettin' the wick wet, son. Just keep on hittin' that shit, and sendin' me a cheque".


I guess that's your answer :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Damned to Hell for having non-reproductive sex, yes.
But if the Church were to excommunicate everyone whom Church doctrine had damned to Hell, there would be no one for the priests to molest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The church
doesn't say that non-reproductive sex, even outside of marriage, will lead to eternal damnation. (Roman Catholic Church, that is.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. It is a venal sin, and unconfessed venal sins lead to damnation
Those who know that what they are doing is a venal sin must make a genuine effort to avoid doing that sin, so it will not work to make regular confession then go home and have sex with your wife. Deliberately pursuing venal sin, knowing that it is a sin, is apostasy from the One True Church (according to RCC doctrine) and thus is a mortal sin, ie a fast track, one way ticket down.

There really is no where to go: engaging in consentual, non-reproductive sex will, according to Catholic doctrine, send you to Hell. There is no way around that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. First of all
.... Unconfessed Venal sins are a problem. But that has nothing to do with this because.....

Second of all, having sex with your spouse is not considered a venal sin. Even if you can't have children.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. They are fine and in a better position than most others: no excommunication necessary
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 10:28 AM by MrWiggles
The couple can say that they are trying really hard and hoping for a miracle. They pray every time they have sex for the woman to become pregnant. You know, their intention is to have a kid even if the odds are against them. People who believe in miracles should not have a problem with this infertile couple frequently working toward a miracle conception.

Therefore, the husband and wife described by the OP have a better excuse to have lots of sex than the people who have no fertility issues and would have to use contraceptives in order to avoid pregnancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. "We keep on praying to god that the condom will break, that the birth control won't work,
and that the spermicidal jelly, intra-uterine device, and the suction vacuum won't work but, Father, god still hasn't answered our prayers and she is not yet with child."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. LOL!
We can start a "Daily Tips for Catholics" website on how to get around not going to hell while enjoying life to its fullest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. You have a point, but,
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 11:29 AM by NoodleBoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC