...would depend upon which erroneous creationist timetable one uses for the beginning of the universe. If one uses the standard rounded 6,000 years and that Moses was reputed to have "existed" around 1300 BCE. That would mean that Yahweh waited some 4,700 years before he laid down any rules.
But more interesting to me is that I've never had anyone explain to me, how it was that Yahweh delivered his "Ten Rules To Live By" in approximately 1300 BCE to Moses, and yet the earliest forms of Hebrew writing only date to around 1000 BCE. That would mean that those Rules were delivered on the mount in a script that didn't yet exist. And the 1000 BCE timeframe references the earliest known forms of Hebrew writing, not religious writing per se. Hebrew was itself a derivative of the Phoenician script which was later adopted and modified by the Greeks from approximately 2000 BCE.
And this simply addresses the timeframe disconnect concerning the delivery of The Rules. What this also suggests to me is that the whole of the biblical narrative account consolidated into its earliest forms of the Torah, had to have been handed down (even using the creationist's timeframe) for almost 5,000 years as a spoken historical account, before Hebrew writing was invented to preserve it. All of which leaves much to be desired for those who champion the idea that the bible is an accurate and exact replication of the word of god. I don't know how this could ever be so, given the adulteration that occurs with just things like rumors which are drastically altered when delivered from one person to the next in a day or two.
Of course personally, I give no validity to the bible being the word of god, but rather several jumbled versions of the words from myths spoken by many gods, and of many beliefs that were later censored, homogenized and condensed. And then translated several times over by the very people who had a vested interest in the words saying what they wanted them to say.
- And after all that, they still managed to screw it up.