I'll leave out any theological issues here, to avoid derailing the conversation
I myself do not believe that there really "is" any such thing as witchcraft. Some people do believe there "is" such a thing. Whether it is erroneous or not, their belief has consequences. Some versions of such beliefs can have very unpleasant consequences. If a person is convinced that another person has cast malicious spells, and is convinced that the supposed effects can only be undone by attacking the supposed spell-caster, then the suspect is in danger of being attacked. And in fact, innocent people suffer as a result.
There is then a practical moral question: is it possible to eliminate the influence of these beliefs in witchcraft, which cause suffering? Your view is apparently that the elimination of such beliefs is acceptable only if it meets your preconceived standard, which (of course) you do not bother to define exactly, preferring merely to complain about "woo woo," a vague and undefinable term
Whether or not one believes in demons or witchcraft or exorcism (and I myself am not much inclined to believe in such things), one might still take the view that it's beneficial to encourage people
who do believe in demons and witchcraft to adopt the view that
demons and witchcraft do not necessarily have any power over them -- and that is, of course, an obvious intent of the remarks you scorn
Although you want to identify the pope's remarks with exorcism, those Catholic priests who practice exorcism regard it as something needed only very rarely: mostly, they take the view that people will benefit from a good listen or psychiatric help:
Archbishop appoints two exorcists
Jennifer Green, The Ottawa Citizen
Published: Saturday, April 05, 2008
... The archdiocese will not name the priests, or say how many exorcists there are for fear of a flood of phone calls. Msgr. Kevin Beach says all the men are experienced clergy with overseas experience, some in areas of the world where belief in demons is more robust than it is in North America ... Exorcists describe the ideal candidate as .. priest, who .. believes in demons, but almost never believes they have someone in their clutches ... Most important, an exorcist is a good listener who can lend a sympathetic ear, administer the sacraments, and, if necessary, nudge someone toward psychiatric help as well ... Jeffrey Grob, exorcist at the archdiocese of Chicago and a former doctoral student at Ottawa's Saint Paul University, says an exorcist in a large, ethnically diverse diocese might get 100 calls a month, mostly from women. The callers complain of bad luck, or they hear or see things they believe are evil. But those who think they are possessed usually aren't, says Father Grob ...
http://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=e2988ac6-b56f-4e85-841a-341ad7b523eeCertainly, if you're actually supporting folk who go to underdeveloped villages to provide good science education and technical innovations (like electricity) that might be associated with reduced belief in the witchcraft, I'm all for it -- though I'd guess you are in reality content merely to sneer at other people's effort. But even if we thoroughly modernize the world and give everyone the benefits of science and technology world, there will be people who develop strange views about the supposed powers of their neighbors: some of these people will be lonely and need sympathy, others will have organic problems that require medical intervention, and some are simply still beyond the reach of science