|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 02:45 PM Original message |
Poll question: Is it possible to bring dead people back to life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Shit. I thought this was gonna be a thread about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. Is this an example of a non-human animal that can return to life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 04:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I would say that it's just not dead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 04:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. If you could chop a person's head off completely with a rusty axe and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 04:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I take it that if you chop a person's head completely off... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Are you assuming that the process of destruction is irreversible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I do assume those things... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. You've obviously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. "Damn it, it wasn't *quite* fresh enough!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. It was mine as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-09-06 10:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
70. There was more than one??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zebedeo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. So you are saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Death is something incredibly hard to define. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Isn't there a difference between saying that something is implausible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Of course. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzteris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. define "dead". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Can you ask an equivalent question without using the word "define"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzteris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 10:08 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. explain what you mean by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Highest degree of deadness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzteris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 11:22 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. then my answer is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neebob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Ah, you mean like when the coroner has thoroughly examined her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the other one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. I thought I saw Elvis once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
29. But Elvis isn't dead, so he doesn't count! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Magic Hair (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:19 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Alongside Sasquatch, eh? I hear they go way back... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Magic Hair (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. They share a commonality with having lots of hair... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Which one uses more hair products? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Magic Hair (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Elvis, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:53 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Maybe he gained Perfect Hair Forever? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-28-06 07:36 AM Response to Reply #29 |
67. Correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
19. Yes, but they return evil and murderous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
20. Two words: Ted Stevens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseIsntCommon (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
21. Well, if your cleric has a high enough level... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
26. Sorry, but I just have to do this: Define 'dead' - after all, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TallahasseeGrannie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
27. If can be brought back to life then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Unless you can guarantee that a particular person will never be brought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TallahasseeGrannie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. WHOA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. On NDEs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zebedeo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 03:20 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. That would not account for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 07:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. A response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zebedeo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 08:31 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. There seems to be evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 09:10 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Seems like a good deal of pre-emprical speculation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zebedeo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 06:16 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. One thing on which we can certainly agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 10:17 PM Response to Reply #44 |
53. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 09:23 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. I Think That The Point Should Be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 10:21 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. I'm not exactly sure what the whole story is, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 09:16 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. This Would Not Explain Really Seeing Things They Couldn't See |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neebob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 09:24 PM Response to Reply #38 |
49. I think people who have NDEs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. The Most Remarkable Stories About NDE's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neebob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 10:28 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. I'd have to read this book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 12:01 AM Response to Reply #32 |
43. I found the study that I was referring to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 09:03 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. So Is The Argument That These Are Hypnotic Phenomena? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 10:28 PM Response to Reply #45 |
56. I think the argument is generally that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neebob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 09:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
46. Why wouldn't it cause you to review your life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 09:25 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. That's A Good Question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neebob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 10:42 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. Yes, and it's a subjective thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-24-06 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
39. I Don't Know, I Always Thought They Brought Reagan Back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catbert836 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
52. I fail to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-26-06 03:05 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. News: some religions speak of resurrection. e.o.m. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catbert836 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-26-06 03:28 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Then what's with the poll? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-26-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Do you really not see how the book of Acts chapter 20 verse 9 has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neebob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-26-06 07:49 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Do you think everyone got out their bibles and read the verse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-27-06 02:59 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. You don't have to actually look in a Bible and read the verse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neebob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-27-06 06:35 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. I thought it was a joke because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-27-06 07:54 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. "What's wrong with a simple yes?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neebob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-28-06 12:41 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Uh-huh, and it's still confusing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
manic expression (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-25-06 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
58. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-07-06 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
68. Different types of possibilites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-07-06 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
69. possibly for whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC