Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What are these "options" to abortion that I hear so much about??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:38 PM
Original message
What are these "options" to abortion that I hear so much about??
I keep hearing/reading about "options to abortion," but I just can't come up with any. Can one of you help me?

Here's the first scenario:

Woman is pregnant.
Woman does not want to have a child.

So her options are:
1) Have an abortion
2) Be an incubator until it's born.

~~~~~~~~~~
Here's the second scenario:
Woman is pregnant.
Woman does not want to BE PREGNANT any longer, much less continue to incubate a fetus until delivery.

So her options are:
1) Have an abortion

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So what are these other options to abortion I keep hearing about? I see only two courses of action: abort or incubate for scenario one, and abort for scenario two.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. According to the fundies: Forced birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. two things I can think of
give the baby up for adoption or keep the kid. I'm not sure how many kids the adoption method can absorb. There's got to be a limit to how many people want to adopt. But it does have it's merits. My best friend is adopted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. As in the past
government run ORPHANAGES. Back in the times when abortion was illegal, even with all the back alley abortions and rich "vacations", there still was nowhere to put all these kids but in an orphanage. My father-in-law lived in one for many years, because his parents couldn't afford to feed him, his brother, and them. He used to say, "I wouldn't put a dog in one of those places." This is our new future if they get their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. that only fits scenario one, and we already know about adoption.
so what's the option under scenario two? I can't think of any except abortion, can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. The method isn't absorbing them now
The U.S. foster child system is full of tens of thousands of children who are eligible for adoption. However, very few people are interested in adopting "flawed" or nonwhite children above a few months old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. You're right
of course, before the pragnacy there should have been better access and types of birth control, but then the pro-lifers are against that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Technowitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. There's not a single pregnant woman on this planet...
...who does not know that one option is to try to carry a baby to term, and then give it up for someone else to raise (whether adoption, or whatever the local culture permits).

The anti-choice foes want the only available choices to include "bring the baby to term." Some few are willing to allow for abortion in the case of rape or incest -- but the hardliners wouldn't allow even this. Heck, at the extreme, they'd just as soon put the mother's life at risk, in such cases where a pregnancy will likely kill or utterly ruin a woman's ability to have any other babies (in the case of abnormal pregnancies).

And no, they don't see anything wrong with forcing a woman to endure the temporary slavery of an unwanted pregnancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ectopic Pregnancy
Correct, the hard line Christians won't "kill" an ectopic pregnancy in the Fallopian tube which has ZERO change of making it to term, but WILL threaten the woman's life. Went through that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Suicide
and trust me, there were quite a few of those in the 50s and 60s when unwed pregnancy was shamed and nearly criminalized.

Then there was the forced marriage to the guy who'd tried to walk away from the whole thing, really great option there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'd forgotten about that one...
:cry: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Undercover Owl Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'll tell ya how to handle unwanted pregnancy:
Save the money you would have spent on an abortion, and spend it on cigarettes and booze. Stay wasted every day, since you didn't want a baby anyhow.

Think this doesn't happen in real life, every day, right now? Try working in Special Education at your local school, and you will encounter these fruits of the womb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. This issue isn't about babies - it's about sex and control
Particularly about the control of women's sexuality.

The people who think that a woman who gets pregnant should only be allowed scenario one, that of carrying to term and then put the baby up for adoption, simply don't acknowledge scenario two: that women might not want to be pregnant. Their "option" for women who don't want to "be pregnant" is "don't have sex". I've seen the sentiment expressed even here on DU - if you have sex, you run the risk of getting pregnant ergo if you don't want to be pregnant, don't have sex.

The mindset is that sex should only be a means of procreation and not even a loving expression between two people who act responsibly should be having sex if they don't want to "accept the consequences".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC