Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Website: WEP&GPO... Social Security Fairness

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 04:08 PM
Original message
Website: WEP&GPO... Social Security Fairness
Edited on Sat Mar-27-10 04:09 PM by tonysam
This is important for public employees in states which don't pay into Social Security and therefore second career public servants are screwed over ROYAL on both Social Security and their measly government pensions:

WEP&GPO... Social Security Fairness

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the link. It is also a good idea...
...to do the LTTE at the NEA website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The proposal by Barney Frank looks a lot better
Edited on Sat Mar-27-10 04:28 PM by tonysam
There are many of us who have worked in public sector work who are getting "cushy" pensions of less than $500 a month while we paid into Social Security for many, many years:

H.R. 726, introduced by Representative Barney Frank, would eliminate the WEP for
those whose combined monthly income from Social Security and the noncovered pension
was less than $2,500 in 2007 (indexed annually to the national average wage). The bill
would gradually phase in the provision for those who have a combined monthly income
of $2,500 through $3,334. For those with combined monthly incomes exceeding $3,334,
the WEP would remain fully applicable. SSA’s Office of the Actuary estimates that this
bill would cost $19 billion between 2008 and 2017 and in the long run would cost 0.02%
of taxable payroll (causing an increase in Social Security’s long-range deficit of about
1%).


If they are all worried about Social Security "solvency," then OUTLAW provisions for states "opting out" of Social Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC