|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-14-10 08:00 PM Original message |
Are Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants Safe? |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-14-10 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. 'Cause everyone knows that eating one form of aluminum is just the same as having another... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-15-10 09:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. And everyone also knows... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-15-10 11:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Exactly. Because table salt is safe, all plutonium salts must be safe! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-15-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Good luck to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-15-10 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
4. Toxic myths about vaccines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-15-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Could you be so kind to point out to us where the above link addresses Chris Shaw's studies?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-15-10 02:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Would you be so kind as to stop pushing anti-vax bs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-15-10 05:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. If Shaw's work has been discredited over and over, it should be easy to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-15-10 08:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. It's clear you have no idea how science works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. So science "works" by ignoring all supposedly flawed peer reviewed, published journal articles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 01:13 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. No, that's not what I'm saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 01:26 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. So what WERE you saying then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 01:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I asked you to figure it out, but it's clear that figuring it out is not something you care about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. You are hilarious. You not only failed to link any scientific articles, you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Actually, I've linked to far more scientific evidence than your anti-vax spin ever could. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 01:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Do you know of ANYONE who has ever even ATTEMPTED to specifically dubunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 01:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. No one needs to debunk a flawed pilot study, that they've looked at to see if it's worth pursuing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Shaw has two studies now, both published in peer reviewed scientific journals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. And yet another switch of bait. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Quit the sophistry. You've produced no critique of Shaw's experiments whatsoever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 07:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I'm sorry, but sophistry is exactly what you've spammed the boards with... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:40 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Can you say something intelligent and critical about Shaw's studies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC