Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Morning sickness 'regulates diet'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:03 PM
Original message
Morning sickness 'regulates diet'
Morning sickness 'regulates diet'


Morning sickness might have evolved to ensure pregnant women do not digest too much unhealthy food, say scientists.
They found evidence that nausea and vomiting in pregnancy is associated with high intake of sugar, alcohol, oils and meat. In contrast, cereals were least likely to trigger sickness. The University of Liverpool analysis of 56 previous studies in 21 countries appears in the Royal Society's Biological Journal.



Morning sickness occurs in the first three months of up to 80% of pregnancies. Until recently, it was thought to be simply an unfortunate by-product of dramatic hormonal changes during early pregnancy. However, research has suggested that morning sickness might have positive consequences - such as a reduced risk of miscarriage.


The researchers believe it is possible that the pregnant human body may have evolved an aversion to foods containing high levels of toxins, and that this may have carried over into modern living. They suggest that the body might reject meat because of the relatively high risk that it might harbour disease-causing agents. Conversely, the low level of plant toxins in cereals may make them particularly unlikely to trigger nausea. However, they say the body's rejection of sugars and oils is less easy to explain.

Lead researcher Dr Craig Roberts said: "While there may be no particular harm in eating, say, meat, now that we have refrigeration and best before dates, our bodies may be pre-programmed by evolution to avoid these particular foodstuffs in the first trimester.

more:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5168882.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. My wife never got morning sickness with our daughter
She miscarried twice, before our daughter was born, and was sick all the time before it happened. When she got prego with our daughter, we were on a health food kick. Never got sick, stayed fairly small, used to anger women in birth class because she could sit straight up while they all waddled.

Just sayin', might be something to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting
I clicked on this because I had horrible morning sickness with both of my kids. It didn't just last a couple of weeks - it was months. I took a drug that later was taken off the market. I don't know what i would have done without it. I was sick, not just in the morning, but all day.

Oddly enough, the stuff I could keep down even with the drugs were ice creme, donuts, carbs carbs carbs.

Well the kids were born - 8lbs 14 1/2oz and 8lbs 15 oz. The drug made me feel like I was hungry all the time so I ate a lot. At least I wasn't throwing up all the time. :shrug:

Don't remember meat triggering vomiting, but the smell of coffee, alcohol, perfume, cigarette smoke sure did.

I wonder what would have happened if I were pregnant 100 years ago. Or even now when the drugs are not available.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. testimonial
Very good friend of mine had pretty bad morning sickness. After she threw up twice in one day she went to the drugstore and bought the acupressure wristbands. (They stimulate P6, which is also the acupuncture point for helping people that get seasick). Within an hour all discomfort was gone and this lasted throughout her pregnancy. Not saying this will help everybody, but it certainly helped her. I think they were cheap. The only downside is yes, they are noticeable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC