Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do some people write: 1 mg kg (-1) instead of just 1 mg/kg?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
DeeJay Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 06:02 PM
Original message
Why do some people write: 1 mg kg (-1) instead of just 1 mg/kg?
The (-1) of course being a superscript. I mean, I know what it means literally, but why not just use the slash? Is it not correct enough?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why don't people write mi/hr instead of mph?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DeeJay Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't know.
Maybe because mph has to be included on car invoices and stickers, and maybe they are trying to conserve space by using 2 fewer digits? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because the slash character is an escape in PERL?
Causes scripts to be harder to handle... :-\
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DeeJay Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That is a good possibility.
Old habits die hard maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Predates PERL.
Predates SNOWBOL.

Hell, it predates transistors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. It keeps it on one line.
It's not so bad with just mg/kg, but J/g K might be confused. Or should that be J/g/K?

J g^-1 K^-1 is utterly unambiguous (when properly typeset) even when on one line. Once you have the "style" guide dictating that J/g K has superscripts, then mg/kg falls under the rule as well--otherwise you'd have to ask why some have the superscript and others don't.

I stopped noticing the difference when I was 17.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Standardisation of notation.
m/s/s is also "legal" but it's just not a form of notation used. ms^-2 is how it's done. G (the gravitational constant) is measured in units of m^3 kg^-1 s^-2. Try expressing that in slash notation.

x per y tends to be a special case in spoken language and informal writing, but standard notation is still much preferred in publication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC