Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grossly Sexist ad in a high-tech magazine...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:48 PM
Original message
Grossly Sexist ad in a high-tech magazine...
...is it NO wonder women don't stay in high-tech. After all they get such RESPECT there - Pffft! :sarcasm:




Oh. And lookie here - isn't this thus the picture of female technical competence from our sexist "buddies" over at Linux Journal:

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9452

...featuring the braindead wo-man named Laverta Voyd who "don't know nothing about computers" - and says: "my husband is the smart one".





Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Gee thanks, bet you're a real hit with the ladies with that line
Men have no idea how sickening this stuff is to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. sorry, forgot to add the sarcasm smilie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. don't be a woman in high-tech - you'll get hit with it daily...
...and it's getting worse.

Armchair apologists and "Ohhh, you're too sensitive!"/"You're over-reacting!" excuses soon to follow this post. Hide and watch.

The techie mysogenists need to get over themselves and cop some clues. We did - a long time ago. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I was in engineering school in the mid 60s
They slapped a coat of paint on a condemned building and called it a women's dorm. They didn't even remove the urinals, obviously considering us a temporary problem.

Trust me, it doesn't get a whole lot worse than what I went through then.

It still nauseates me that men are so hostile and so clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Jeeeeeeeze. I'm sorry warpy...
...I wish we could day it's improved, but it obviously hasn't.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is worse than anything from the past.
At least the models on the old tool calendars were in on the joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Would it make any difference if the pic was of a man?
Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The ad wouldn't target the desired audience in that instance.
Unless all tech geeks are females or gay guys. And they're not.

In this case, though, they're trying to evoke Monica Lewinsky in not-so-subtle fashion, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. ALL tech geeks are not guys either - THAT is the problem...
...the attitude that they are (or should be) is just SO clueless and sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I didn't say they were, but the preponderance of geeks are male.
That's why they felt they could get away with that ghastly ad.

I'd write to the company, and gripe. And post the thing everywhere, especially in forums that specialize in equal opportunity and women's issues. If you have an email address to complain, put that up, too.

Heck, send it to Olbermann--maybe he'll do a short bit on it. That's tailor made for WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. They've received letters - and they didn't pull the ad but decided not to rerun it...
...at least.

But the thing is, that it was run in the first place and there were and will be others. And I think the attitudes behind that decision are faulty and damaging to men and women in technical fields.

If the preponderance of geeks are male, does anyone doubt that this type of attitude - that is behind ads like this, might be partially (at least) why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. If you're a female in the industry, you've got to step up and be a role model and a mentor
to other females in the biz. That's what happened in the Senate, with Margaret Chase Smith, Barbara Milkulski, etc.. it's what happened in the military, and in other outfits where there was limited representation of women in the workforce.

Maybe you can persuade your bosses to formalize the effort, with internships and formal mentoring programs?

My experience is that females are more reliable employees--they're sick less, don't go out and get drunk and not show up for work, fewer accidents, and even with pregnancies factored in, they lose less time on the job than males...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Yep. Well said....It really irks me to see other women in high-tech
Edited on Tue Aug-21-07 02:47 PM by Triana
....stab their peers in the back. Some of the women themselves are sexist! I know one who told me once "Well, I think MEN are better at that stuff anyway and I'd rather work with them!".

I had to point out to her that it was because women have so few MENTORS and mentoring can make a LOT of difference in a person's career. This woman, who said this, was the manager of some female techies - here she was complaining about this - making these comments without realizing that SHE was part of the problem!

THAT ain't how you mentor people -- by running them down like that. :wtf: There is/was SO much this woman could do for those women - but she doesn't.

UNbelievable.

Guaaaaaaaaaachhhh!

I wanted to smack her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Don't smack--SHAME. Write her a letter and tell her what an opportunity she wasted.
Tell her how she reinforced a hideous and false stereotype about clawing, catfighting women. Tell her how disappointed you were in her behavior, and how sorry you are for her because she was apparently so insecure that she couldn't lift up her juniors and become an example to be remembered and admired.

Lay it on with a trowel, make her feel like whaleshit!!! That's what I'd do! Then, send the letter, with her name stripped out, to a tech magazine or ten, and either fold it into a letter to the editor, or ask them to do a story on the need for female mentors in the industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. GREAT Idea...
...I know of some magazines who would be interested too...at least one or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. To ME - yes, it's just as bad (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. It would still be ridiculous. But it would never be of a man.
That right there is the problem.

There is no equivalent mass objectification of men in patriarchal culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. So, a lot of guys want other guys to go down on them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. That is astounding. And so fucking TONE DEAF it isn't funny.
Of course, the classic stereotype of a computer geek is either a skinny little fucker with massive, festering pimples, or a morbidly obese, smelly guy with massive festering pimples.

Whoever came up with that ad was thinking like an ugly fucker with massive pimples. It's quite pathetic. But unsurprising, I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yep that's pretty bad
However stacked up against almost every single sit com, ad and romatic comedy genre movie that nigh-unanimously make men out to be stupid, bumbling, selfish and subordinate to women who are vastly more intelligent, sensible, patient and decent, it's far from alone in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. It's true that they do that.
When we addressed media bias in my classroom, one of my students pointed that out. I went home and I swear like 5 commercials in a row followed exactly that pattern of the incompetent white male.

I think the reason they do that (and can get away with it) is that minority groups and women actually do suffer real consequences of discrimination when they reinforce those stereotypes. When they do it to white males, it's not really reinforcing anything, because our culture already perceives, and continues to perceive, white males as most competent, and they are still most likely to get callbacks from resumes and to get hired for technical jobs. If they continually showed black females as incompetent, well, you can see the problem.

Some types of mocking reinforce power structures and bigotry, and some don't. Mocking of white males generally doesn't.

I would still prefer to see ads that discuss the product itself, though. If they can't come up with an actual reason why their product is better, no matter what the commercial is about, it leaves me thinking hmmm, I'll just buy generic. I guess I'm too cynical for the "our branding as your identity" game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. lwfern - DARN good point about reinforcement...
...in a tech field, I can tell you that white males are seen as most competent and given worship-level kudos for tasks or jobs well done while others (women, blacks) hardly get noticed when they do a great job or complete a major task.

AND in addition to that and to reinforce THAT too, the most 'visible' projects/tasks go to the white males while the more mundane day to day stuff gets assigned to others - easier to ignore the 'less visible' stuff that they do.

The whole thing is quite systematic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it's bullshit to portray woman as knowing less about computer issues t han men, but I don't
have a problem with them adding an attractive lady into an advert. Men are 70% visual and it's useless to pretend otherwise. NOT saying, however, that gives anyone a right to degrade or disrespect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. When the ad compares a woman who WON'T give you a blowjob to your server, though
that's not just "visual." That's, as those fuckers at GE say, IMAGINATION AT WORK.

It's OTT, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. EXACTLY what MADem said....
...OTT duJour
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. As my husband, a software engineer says, "I don't do hardware."
That means if the hardware stuff is going to get done, I have to do it. Well, most of the time, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's sexist and vulgar. Let's find their web address and complain. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thanks for posting this
as the multimedia person for my school district, it's always nice to see who doesn't want my business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. Write: sales@qsol.com and complain! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. I emailed this:
"I saw the “don’t feel bad, our servers won’t go down on you either” ad online today.

I really dislike seeing women portrayed as mindless sex toys for men in order to sell products. That endless and ubiquitous message that THIS is what women exist for, THIS is what women are reduced to, is mind-numbing, if you actually are female. If your ads don’t work in a gender neutral way, so that the person depicted in the ad could be either gender, that’s a clue that you probably are running a sexist campaign.

Please make an attempt to sell your product, instead of selling women. That’s not what we’re here for.

Thank you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Bwah! Excellent! They didn't re-run the ad but IMO they STILL need to hear about this crap...
...I'm writing them one myself - along with a few other people who need their noses rubbed in these types of attitudes per MADem's suggestion.

If we don't call it out, call them on it every time we see it, they'll NEVER get a clue. Of course they haven't been to swift in getting any even at that but we have to do what we can.

Great letter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm going to puke on my keyboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. good grief are they STILL running that ad?
I saw that ad (or one damn near identical to it) back in 99? 00?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. It evokes Monica, you see--they thought they were being so Gee Oh Pee, too! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. ewwwwww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC