Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Petraeus Wins Support in Troop Cut Delay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:41 AM
Original message
Petraeus Wins Support in Troop Cut Delay



Petraeus Wins Support in Troop Cut Delay
Military.com | By Christian Lowe | February 25, 2008

The top commander in charge of coalition forces in Iraq said Friday senior Pentagon officials agree with him that a rapid drawdown of U.S. troops in that country should be curtailed in favor of a more gradual, "conditions-based" approach to reductions.

In an exclusive interview with Military.com from his headquarters in Baghdad, Gen. David Petraeus, the Multi-National Forces-Iraq commander, explained that he'd held close consultations with Central Command chief Adm. William Fallon and Defense Secretary Bill Gates and won them over on keeping troop levels steady after July.

"I've had a chance to talk to most of the members of the Joint Chiefs in recent weeks ... Adm. Fallon was just out and I think we see the world the same way," Petraeus explained. "He endorsed ... the concept of a period of consolidation and evaluation following the substantial withdrawals that will be completed by the end of July, before continuing with further reductions."

In January, Gates launched what some considered a competing assessment from the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Iraqi security that would coincide with an update on the "surge" Petraeus was scheduled to deliver to Congress in the spring.

Reports have indicated that Joint Chiefs chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen, favors a withdrawal of forces to 10 brigades by the end of the year over concerns that the lengthy Iraq deployments are straining the ground forces beyond repair.


Rest of article at: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,162658,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. well . . . I think the Feb casualty count may also have influenced that
the surge may not be working as well as advertised . . .

2 more yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. 'Condition based'? Does that mean when the facts don't fit the
happy picture that this bunch of clowns are trying to project? Or when the oil agreement turning everything they have over to Exxon-Mobile is signed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC