Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone concerned about Kerry's age in 08?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
RunningFromCongress Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 02:54 AM
Original message
Anyone concerned about Kerry's age in 08?
He'll be what, 64? That's 72 @ the end of 8. IMO that's a bit old. I'd still vote for him, but man that's old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Most presidents weren't young until Clinton and Bush
And now the trend is for someone in his 50s to run. But before that, most men were older. Also, Kerry is very fit and active and healthy, and he doesn't look or act his age even now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't care. He's a badass. He'll be fine.
Once again, for the official record, I think he's the best all-around to be president. Can't come up with a single other person in government who's better qualified. Love him. Still support him. Plan to go on supporting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vinessa4freedom Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Most 60 year olds aren't like him
still motor biking, still obviously in shape. ;) Besides look at the energy he's showing right now on the job. His chronological age is irrelevant--John Kerry is young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why is that a problem?
64 is hardly old. Kerry seems physically fit (though he tends to be a bit thin) and is mentally as sharp as ever.

What's the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Must have been the jumping jacks with the MIT students!
Edited on Thu May-05-05 02:43 PM by karynnj
He looked more physicaly fit the entire grop of young students he was with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. No, I don't think its a factor
He's healthy, fit and sharp as a tack. I don't think that will change by 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not a factor at all.
To echo what everyone else says, he's not old at all. He's sharp, he's active. I know a lot of 50-year olds who seem older than him.

So, no. I wouldn't give it a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Also his age is not that different from many competitors
Edited on Thu May-05-05 09:01 AM by karynnj
From a few goggles of biographies:

Wes Clark was born in Dec 1944 - so he's one year younger
Hillary Clinton was born in 1947 - so she's at most 3 years younger
(Evan Bayh (dec 55) and John Edwards are genuinely younger)

At their age, these number differences are not the least bit significant. Their healthiness is - Bill Clinton is also a few years younger than Kerry - although he looks much older at this time.

My guess is that all three of them have lived healthier lives then most people. Barring any major health problem that develop in the next three years, there's no reason to rule any of them out.

(If Kerry could participate in a bike race of more than 100 miles in his late 50s, and keep the schedule he keeps, he may be able to outrun current 40 year olds now, and will still outrun them when he is 81 and they are 60.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Reagan was about 72 when first elected but his problem was that
he wasn't mentally able. he already had Alzeimers and he slept through a lot of the crap.

and KErry ins't going to run when he is 72. if he does run it will be before that when he is in his 60s.

Robert Byrd is in his mid 80s and is much quicker and able in discussing issues than many far younger than him .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Reagan was 69 when he was elected in '80.
He was the oldest elected Pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. I am not
though I have to admit, it would have been a lot better if he had been elected earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. No problem
Assuming he remains as healthy in 2008 as now, I don't see this as an issue. Lots of people remain very healthy at 72.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrydemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Age Doesn't Matter To Me
That is the last thing I would ever worry about. And besides that Kerry can out do many of those who are a lot younger than him. Hell most men his age just wish they looked and felt have as good as Kerry does. Kerry is very active all time wether it is in his work or his hobbies. Besides that how many men that age look as relaxed and right at home on a Harley and loves to Rock-n-Roll as that man does. Age? Concerned? No Way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. 64 is young these days
And I'd sure rather have somebody from that particular age group than the younger 50-something yuppified group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yeah. If 70 is the new 50, then 64 can be the new 44.
Especially if it's Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Age? Whats that?
Us boomers are catagorically refusing to get old like our parents did. It's so passe! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. No way...
Age doesn't matter.

He'll still be the same John Kerry as we know of today. Just a little bit older and grayier :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't think it matters
Everyone who is running is about mid 50s to mid 60s I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. He's fitter and healthier than I am
And I'm only in my 40's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC