|
...and, as to the vaunted "video recording" feature, I'll just repeat here what I wrote on DPReview.com's Sony forum, when a distraught owner asked why it couldn't be Sony instead of Nikon that introduced this feature: that it's because Sony, much like Canon, already produces high-quality DV and HD camcorders (both consumer and professional) and know enough to realize that the functional and ergonomic requirements of video recording are so incompatible with those of still photography that any "hybrid" will be a drastic compromise that will shortchange one of the two functions -- most likely video rather than still photography -- to the extent that will make it useless for serious work. Only Nikon (which has never produced a camcorder) is naive enough to think that such a hybrid will work. It might be O.K. for capturing a few "home movie" video clips to play back on your family room's neato new plasma HDTV, but anyone who's expecting this to turn them into Ansel Adams and Steven Spielberg (or, on a more modest scale, to simply be able to shoot a low-budget "indie" feature along with one's landscape photography -- both of which, I should point out, I've done, albeit on completely different equipment), is going to be doomed to disappointment.
|