|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 04:41 PM Original message |
Humpty-Dumpty Republicans By William Rivers Pitt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. A perfect political storm is brewing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sex scandal....coming right up...only a matter of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 04:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. There already is a sex scandal: Watergate II (Sloppy Seconds Edition) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 07:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
30. Too vague for most americans...bring on the interns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 09:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Limos delivering congressmen to hookers at the Watergate is vague? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 09:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. "reportedly" been indicted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Geez. Give it a rest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. When you do. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 09:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
34. Thank You. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. There are still 24 business hours.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loge23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. The immigration putsch will drive wage pressure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 09:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
35. Bingo! Pitt hit it right on the nail, again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
8. 'Karl Rove has reportedly been indicted' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meisje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
10. Shouldn't "reportedly been indicted" read "allegedly been indicted"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. it's so confusing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. A new low, really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:44 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Ummmm, Will Pitt did not write the article about Rove being indicted, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 06:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Who personally vouched for the story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 06:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Yes, he vouched for it and has never posted otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 11:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. oh my GOD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 12:00 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Well it's written in strange third person, as if someone else reported it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Some one else did report it: Jason Leopold. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Will Pitt was confident enough in its veracity to defend it vigorously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:51 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Posting on a link on DU doesn't mean he is the one who reported the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. He was confident enough to flame Skinner for expressing a shade of doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 06:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Vouching for Lepold doesn't mean it's Pitt's story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 06:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Nevertheless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 06:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. He could have said: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 07:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. What do you consider the job of a senior editor to be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 07:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Does Pitt have to be a senior editor to vouch for Leopold? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 07:20 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Do senior editors make the ultimate decision whether or not an article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 07:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Depends! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:01 AM Response to Reply #28 |
42. Pitt, did briefly name one corroborating source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sheelz (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 12:23 AM Response to Reply #26 |
41. According to Pitt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 10:05 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. When someone defends something this vigorously, he owns it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 10:10 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. "IF the story turns out to be bogus," says it all. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 10:16 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. yeah, it's a big "if." Maybe Leopold was lied to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golden voyages (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 07:28 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. I don't post here much, but isn't that the same person who once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 05:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Well, Truthout reports Rove already has been indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
32. 'Tis mind blogging when one thinks of how wealthy the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC