Simply put: Was Rove indicted on Friday or was he not indicted on Friday?

[trumad]

Skinner mentioned this in another thread as the central question of Leopold's story and if that question is ultimately answered, then we'll know if the story was accurate or not.

If Rove is indicted and Fitz states in his press conference that they had indicted Rove on May 12, 2006--- well let's just say that Leopold's career will jump up quite considerably.

If Fitz states that it's nonsense--- well let's just say that Jason's journo career will be on life support.

I sense that some here are rooting for Jason's failure and I simply don't get that? It's
this pack of wolves mentality that sometimes permeates this forum. Sure the dude has made mistakes in his reporting in the past--- but what the hell has he done to us? Nothing.

I'm rooting hard for the guy and the folks at TruthOut. We all win if he was right and we'll still win if he's wrong and Rove is still indicted.

Like I said above--- We've posted countless threads (including this one) and typed thousands of words on this story--- and all it comes down to is if the dude was indicted on the 12 of May.

mhop

[babylonsister]

1. Ummm....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1224473

[trumad]

2. I didn't see that

oh well

[RoadRunner]

3. Locking

All discussions regarding Truthout/Leopold/Rove Indictment should be posted here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1224473