NASTY FOES NOW OWE APOLOGIES TO GORE
... Even more impressive than Gore's mastery of this grave matter is his remarkably consistent and courageous effort to save the planet. In 1997, he went to the Kyoto conference in pursuit of a global accord, despite advisers who said his role there would jeopardize his political future. In the spring of 2000, he reissued "Earth in the Balance," his 1992 book on the subject, on the eve of his presidential nomination. Just to be sure that nobody misunderstood him, he added a new foreword and postscript emphasizing his commitment to "completely eliminating" the internal-combustion engine.
Admiral James Stockdale called him a "fanatic." Dan Quayle said his views were "bizarre, detached from reality, and devoid of common sense." P.J. O'Rourke called him "nutty." Grover Norquist compared him to the Unabomber. David Frum accused him of wanting to "dismantle the American economy in the name of environmental regulation." Indeed, Gore became a safe, easy target for every Republican politician and every right-wing commentator, who brandished "Earth in the Balance" as if it were "The Communist Manifesto." "This is a book written by an extremist, and it's filled with extremism. . . . He wants to do away with the automobile as we know it today," complained Jim Nicholson, then the Republican national chairman (and now the secretary of veterans affairs). What was once the most controversial recommendation in Gore's book -- phasing out that infernal combustion engine -- is today the official objective of the Bush administration.
And, of course, the same hacks who shrieked back then about the damage this radical change would inflict on the American economy would surely praise President Bush for his farsighted leadership. Eight years later, Dubya tried to have it both ways, attacking Gore for environmentalist excess while promising to reduce carbon-dioxide levels in the atmosphere. Upon entering the Oval Office, he promptly abandoned that pledge, and has since flipped and flopped more times than a dying fish.
As president, he has tried to suppress government data that backs the world scientific consensus, while promoting the "contrarian" opinions of quacks and mountebanks. "I read the report put out by the bureaucracy," sneered the president when asked about a study on climate change issued by the Environmental Protection Agency . He used to sneer at Gore's book, too, which he never actually read, and says he "doubts" that he will bother to see "An Inconvenient Truth."
http://www.localnewsleader.com/kindred/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=196803