Now WHO would Terrorize the N. Y. Times with Fake Anthrax & why?

[Philosoraptor]

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/14/national/main1807018.shtml

Now why whould Michelle Malkin send a mysterious, harmless powdered substance to the New York Times offices?

[slackmaster]

1. It's summer

School's out.

Go figure.

[ray of light]

2. think of the connection...

in 2001 to Anthrax and the abortion clinics.

[Freedom_from_Chains]

3. Most likely an example of our own fundamental terrorism we have

in America.

[Lerkfish]

4. this is what comes from the RW rhetoric, accusing the times of treason

it means some idiot will actually take them up on their hate speech and try to assasinate people. It works for the anti-choicers as well. They whip up the hate speech, knowing someone on the edge will believe it and ACT.
then, they can pretend to have nothing to do with it.

Coulter discussed different methods of execution for the NYT. I honestly don't know how that is not considered illegal hatespeech.

:shrug:

[kevinmc]

5. Coulter again called for NY Times staff to be "executed"

Ann Coulter again suggested that New York Times staff members should be "executed" over the paper's reports on the National Security Agency's warrantless domestic eavesdropping program and a Treasury Department program designed to track international financial transactions for terrorist activity. Read more

http://mediamatters.org/items/dailyemail/200607140015?src=other