Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Relativity drive: The end of wings and wheels?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:21 PM
Original message
Relativity drive: The end of wings and wheels?
http://www.newscientisttech.com/article/mg19125681.400;jsessionid=NMGHKBGMCGMM

Relativity drive: The end of wings and wheels?

Justin Mullins


(snip)

Of course, any crackpot can rough out plans for a warp drive. What they never show you is evidence that it works. Shawyer is different. He has built a working prototype to test his ideas, and as a respected spacecraft engineer he has persuaded the British government to fund his work. Now organisations from other parts of the world, including the US air force and the Chinese government, are beating a path to his tiny company.

The device that has sparked their interest is an engine that generates thrust purely from electromagnetic radiation - microwaves to be precise - by exploiting the strange properties of relativity. It has no moving parts, and releases no exhaust or noxious emissions. Potentially, it could pack the punch of a rocket in a box the size of a suitcase. It could one day replace the engines on almost any spacecraft. More advanced versions might allow cars to lift from the ground and hover. It could even lead to aircraft that will not need wings at all. I can't help thinking that it sounds too good to be true.

(snip)

With that pedigree, you'd imagine Shawyer would be someone the space industry would have listened to. Far from it. While at Astrium, Shawyer proposed that the company develop his idea. "I was told in no uncertain terms to drop it," he says. "This came from the very top."

What Shawyer had in mind was a replacement for the small thrusters conventional satellites use to stay in orbit. The fuel they need makes up about half their launch weight, and also limits a satellite's life: once it runs out, the vehicle drifts out of position and must be replaced. Shawyer's engine, by contrast, would be propelled by microwaves generated from solar energy. The photovoltaic cells would eliminate the fuel, and with the launch weight halved, satellite manufacturers could send up two craft for the price of one, so you would only need half as many launches.

(much more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. It works well... except...
That anybody in its path ends up like "Kentucky Fried Chicken".
:evilgrin:

This is not a solution for deep space probes which would not have solar energy at their disposal. But, if it works as documented, this would be great for the inner solar system exploration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. The corpses* who sell rocket fuel, profit from nukes, build weapons, and
push "stars wars" defenses don't want solar-energized microwave power for a REASON. They have not done looting the government and the public with old technologies and their domination of existing (dangerous, polluting) resources.

-----------

*(corpses = business entities that monopolize products and services, price-fix, price-gouge, and accumulate the diseased bodies of other businesses to eliminate competition, that routinely kill creativity and enterprise, and that live forever, like vampires; i.e., corporations.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Unfortunately, you're right
The only way this technology could spread is if governments shield it from attack by corporations, but that solution assumes the governments are not unduly influenced by the same antagonistic corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC