Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Anyone Got Answer From Carville re: Tip To Wife About Ohio Ballots?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:08 PM
Original message
Has Anyone Got Answer From Carville re: Tip To Wife About Ohio Ballots?
Carville has always appeared to a Democratic loyalist. But if the assertion in Woodward's book is true, it explains a lot about the odd handling of ballots in Ohio by Blackwell.

I just wonder if Carville has ducked quesions about this so far.

Would like to hear his response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't understand why what he did made any difference.
I don't see how he was disclosing any damaging information and I don't understand why his tip to the repukes would have made Kerry decide not to challenge the vote.

Am I misunderstanding how this worked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpoffdaplanet Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm with you on this
It doesn't make any sense. So what if Carville mentioned something to the wife, who passed it to cheney.

If I remember, at the time, everyone assumed Kerry would challenge Ohio seeing how fucked up the vote was that day.

There wouldn't be any surprise to knowing for sure.

I'm wondering if this is a way to get past the fact that Kerry dropped the ball that day.

Lots of people, including myself, were furious at Kerry for running out on the voters that day.

And now I hear Kerry is going to run in 2008.

They have to do something to get the bad taste of Kerry's running away that day.

Maybe they decided to use Woodward to pass on a story to lets Kerry off the hook.

Now, the story will be, "no, kerry didn't run and hide, he was forced to run away."

I'm not buying it. And I'm not voting for Kerry again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Kerry, like Gore, probably got the most votes
and both should have been president. Since Kerry could not prove voter fraud because of paperless ballots, he let it go.

Very few of democrats believed the W actually won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Kerry didn't run and hide in Nam
W did. Remember that. Kerry served two tours. W served none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpoffdaplanet Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Didn't say anything about his service there.
But he did run away from the fight that Nov 8.

Pretending Carville had anything to do with it is just another cover-up.

And cover-ups are not the act of someone who wants to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. No. you're not.
The book doesn't imply that Carville's gossip did anything to hurt Kerry. Rather, it shows what took place to create tensions within the Bush campaign regarding when to announce that they thought they had won. Woodward has other information on some of the issues that Kerry had the option of contesting. He also makes clear that, until early evening, the reports from across the country had indicated to the Bush folks that they were going to lose.

That said, a person who questions the results, and who thinks that Kerry had an Ohio option, will not be disappointed reading this book. Anyone who looks for it to indicate Carville was in any sense a factor in anything but being a loud mouth may be disappointed. I am surprised this is being pushed as an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've never trusted him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ITA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC